Skip to content

Conversation

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

@afs afs commented Dec 8, 2025

Correct link to "solution", remove "binding".

(SHACL Core uses "binding" for prefixes)

@afs afs force-pushed the dfn-links branch 2 times, most recently from a920a1a to e0af305 Compare December 8, 2025 13:11
@afs afs changed the title <dfn> as singluar, align future external <dfn> <dfn> as singluar Dec 8, 2025
@afs afs changed the title <dfn> as singluar <dfn> as singular Dec 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@robert-david robert-david left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if i understood this correctly, but the anchors
https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl12-core/#dfn-binding
https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl12-core/#dfn-solution
still don't work.

Copy link
Contributor

@HolgerKnublauch HolgerKnublauch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I noticed that #668 is not yet approved and has the same fix but in shacl-sparql. I suggest to approve that branch instead and change the links to shacl12-sparql as my PR deletes them from shacl-core.

@afs
Copy link
Contributor Author

afs commented Dec 9, 2025

Not sure if i understood this correctly, but the anchors https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl12-core/#dfn-binding https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl12-core/#dfn-solution still don't work.

The TR version is the state of the default to branch (gh-pages) and gets updated-by-bot soon after a merge.

@afs
Copy link
Contributor Author

afs commented Dec 9, 2025

A link for solution now goes to SPARQL Query.

There is nothing gained by involving SHALCL SPARQL.

@afs afs changed the title <dfn> as singular Correct link to "solution" Dec 9, 2025
@afs
Copy link
Contributor Author

afs commented Dec 9, 2025

@HolgerKnublauch - this needs your review - the previous block remains active.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants