This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 26, 2026. It is now read-only.
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathTextGenerator1.txt
More file actions
17 lines (17 loc) · 3.84 KB
/
TextGenerator1.txt
File metadata and controls
17 lines (17 loc) · 3.84 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Every year, millions of monarch butterflies fly up to 3,000 miles from southern Canada and the upper reaches of the United States to their wintering grounds in mountain forests outside Mexico City.
“Everybody knows about the monarchs’ migration,” says Andy Davis, an animal ecologist at the University of Georgia. “But one of the things that we still don’t understand very well is how they’re capable of making such a tremendous flight while being such a small animal with limited energy.”
Amazingly, some of the monarch’s continent-spanning magic may be owed to the size of its itty bitty wing spots, according to a study published today in PLOS One.
By studying photos of wing patterns of nearly 400 monarchs collected at various locations on their migration path, Davis and his co-authors discovered an interesting pattern—butterflies that make the journey all the way to Mexico tend to have white wing spots that are three percent larger than those of monarchs found in places such as Georgia or Minnesota. At the same time, the Mexican animals have three percent less black coloration on their wings than monarchs collected during earlier phases of the multi-generational migration. (Read how monarch butterflies migrate 3,000 miles.)
Now, here’s why this is interesting.
Migrating monarchs soar at heights of up to 1,200 feet. As sunlight hits those wings, it heats them up, but unevenly. Black areas get hotter, while white areas stay cooler. The scientists believe that when these forces are alternated, as they are with a monarch’s white spots set against black bands on the wings’ edges, it seems to create micro-vortices of air that reduce drag—making flight more efficient.
Similar drag-reducing characteristics have been discovered in shark skin and the coloration of seabird wings. All of it adds up to some serious potential for the future of human technologies.
“If you want to develop drones that are flying for longer time and harnessing energy from sunlight, this is the best thing that we can look at,” says study co-author Mostafa Hassanalian, an associate professor of mechanical engineering at New Mexico Tech.
How the monarch butterfly got its spots
The second part of the study evaluated size differences in white spots between the monarch and six of its closest cousins in the genus Danaus.
When study co-author Christina Vu, then a student of Davis’, quantified the size of all those butterflies’ spots, she found the monarchs had by far the largest white markings. Next were the southern monarchs (D. erippus), which are semi-migratory, followed by the other five species—including the Jamaican monarch (D. cleophile), the solider or tropical queen (D. erisimus thetys), the queen (D. gilippus Berenice), and striated queen (D. g. strigose)—none of which migrate.
Indeed, it seems spot size—and, the scientists theorize, its ability to reduce drag—might be linked to migration itself.
“I think that the fall migration is already a major selective event each year,” says Davis. “It ensures that only the fittest individuals reach the finish line. The ones without any infections; or disease; or with the biggest, most robust wings.” (See National Geographic's amazing photos of monarchs.)
“And in this case, the best spot patterns,” he says.
The butterfly effect
“A butterfly can flap its wings in Peking and in New York, you get rain instead of sunshine,” quips Jeff Goldblum’s character in the original Jurassic Park.
From Havana to Donnie Darko, many films have introduced audiences to the so-called “butterfly effect,” or the general idea that small changes can sometimes create large consequences. And while many references misinterpret the idea originally laid out by MIT meteorology professor Edward Lorenz in 1963, it’s tempting to use the metaphor as a way to understand how a monarch’s wing patterns could be of any consequence.