Skip to content

osm_type definition for areas ? #6

@etienneJr

Description

@etienneJr

Hi again!
Can you explain to me why, in both backend, the osm_type is w for ways and a for relations ? I was expecting a for both, and I can't find the explanation elsewhere.
Thanks!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions