Skip to content

Linked List 1#1793

Open
YogeshPardeshi wants to merge 3 commits into
super30admin:masterfrom
YogeshPardeshi:master
Open

Linked List 1#1793
YogeshPardeshi wants to merge 3 commits into
super30admin:masterfrom
YogeshPardeshi:master

Conversation

@YogeshPardeshi
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Reverse a LinkedList (Problem1.java)

Strengths:

  • The solution is clean, concise, and follows the correct iterative approach for reversing a linked list
  • Variable naming is clear and descriptive (prev, curr, temp)
  • The logic flow is easy to follow
  • Handles all edge cases correctly (empty list, single node, multiple nodes)
  • In-place reversal with O(1) space complexity

Areas for Improvement:

  • The solution is already optimal for this problem. No significant improvements needed.
  • Could optionally add comments explaining the reversal logic for better readability, but the code is self-explanatory.

VERDICT: PASS


Remove nth node (Problem2.java)

Strengths:

  • Excellent use of the two-pointer technique, which is the optimal approach for this problem
  • Smart use of a dummy node simplifies edge case handling (removing the first node)
  • Clean, readable code with meaningful variable names
  • Properly cleans up the removed node reference
  • Achieves the follow-up requirement of one-pass solution

Areas for Improvement:

  • The code is already well-optimized. One minor suggestion: the while loop condition count <= n could be written as count < n + 1 for slightly better clarity, though both are correct.

VERDICT: PASS


Cycle in linked list (Problem3.java)

Strengths:

  • Correct implementation of Floyd's cycle detection algorithm
  • Good variable naming conventions
  • Clean and readable code structure
  • Proper handling of edge cases (null head)
  • Achieves O(1) space complexity as required by the follow-up

Areas for Improvement:

  • The flag boolean variable is unnecessary. You can determine if a cycle exists by checking if the loop exited via the condition or via the break statement. If slow == fast after the loop, a cycle exists; otherwise, return null.
  • Consider adding comments to explain the Floyd's algorithm logic, especially the mathematical relationship that makes finding the cycle start possible.

Minor Optimization:

// Instead of using flag, you can simplify to:
while (fast != null && fast.next != null) {
    slow = slow.next;
    fast = fast.next.next;
    if (slow == fast) break;
}

if (fast == null || fast.next == null) return null; // No cycle

slow = head;
while (slow != fast) {
    slow = slow.next;
    fast = fast.next;
}
return slow;

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants