[6.x] Reconsider backdrop blur usage

[robdekort]

Bug description

In stacks, like here, blur is used to dim the main content:

I can totally see why you might want to dim the left part a bit to move focus to the stack and to convey to users what's happening to the interface. In previous versions this was done using a transparent dark layer.

In practice, during content editing, I've found the heavy blur makes it impossible to reference anything from the main page that I might need, like field handles.

And therefore you could even argue a big win usability wise for using a stack (to keep context) is eliminated by using that very blur.

How to reproduce

.

Logs

Environment

beta.3

Installation

Fresh statamic/statamic site via CLI

Additional details

No response

[robdekort]

Putting the bard link popover in a stack in #13306 is a great improvement. The popover always finicky i.m.o.

But it is definitely more ammo for the argument I'm making here. Not being able to see what you selected to link from and what content surrounds it, ain't a great UX.

vs:

[daun]

We're getting the same feedback from users. The dark backdrop is sufficient to communicate focus on the modal. Adding the blur removes the possibility of referencing the underlying content for little gain.

[jasonvarga]

We're on it!