Remove arrogant comment

Let's leave it to consumers to decide which metadata model is "richer"
and which one they "should prefer". They know their own use cases.

Author: ctrueden

pom.xml

@@ -1,9 +1,5 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 https://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
-	<!-- This module was also published with a richer model, Gradle metadata,  -->
-	<!-- which should be used instead. Do not delete the following line which  -->
-	<!-- is to indicate to Gradle or any Gradle module metadata file consumer  -->
-	<!-- that they should prefer consuming it instead. -->
 	<!-- do_not_remove: published-with-gradle-metadata -->
 	<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>