Skip to content

branch: 1.1-phetio #140

@pixelzoom

Description

@pixelzoom

In #139, I was attempting to publish a new version of Function Builder. The published version is 1.0.x, so I was expecting to be publishing 1.1.x. But when I went to publish the dev version of Function Builder, it was 1.2.x. Investigation revealed a 1.1-phetio branch and many 1.1 versions published to bayes. That resulted in a lot of confusion and a significant detour.

It looks like @samreid, @zepumph, and @jonathanolson were involved in this. As the responsible dev for this repo, please help me understand (or remember) what is going on here.

There is no 1.1 branch, but there is a 1.1-phetio branch. I'm not sure who created it.

function-builder has no PhET-iO instrumentation, and brand=phet is not enabled in package.json.

Here are the 1.1 versions on bayes, annotated with who published them (according to git history):

% ls -ltd 1.1.*
drwxrwsr-x+ 2 tomcat     phet 118 Jun  5  2017 1.1.0-dev.4/ => ??
drwxrwsr-x+ 2 tomcat     phet 102 May 17  2017 1.1.0-dev.3/ => ??
drwxrwxr-x+ 5 tomcat     phet 133 Nov 12  2016 1.1.2-phetiophetio/ => @samreid 
drwxrwxr-x+ 5 tomcat     phet 134 Oct  5  2016 1.1.1-phetio/ => @zepumph 
drwxrwxr-x+ 6 tomcat     phet 151 Sep 30  2016 1.1.0-phetio/ => @zepumph 
drwxrwsr-x+ 5 tomcat     phet 207 Sep 28  2016 1.1.0-phetio.4/ => @mattpen
drwxrwxr-x+ 4 tomcat     phet 118 Sep 24  2016 1.1.0-phetiodev.3/ => @samreid 
drwxrwsr-x+ 3 tomcat     phet 137 Aug 29  2016 1.1.0-dev.2/ => @samreid 
drwxrwsr-x+ 3 tomcat     phet 137 Aug 23  2016 1.1.0-dev.1/ => @samreid 

Questions:

  • Why was this branch created? What PhET-iO work was involved?

  • Are any of these versions used by clients, being maintained, in the PhET-iO spreadsheet, etc?

  • If these versions were published from 1.1-phetio, why is the syntax for these version numbers all over the place? And I'm not clear on how we got version numbers with "1.1.x-dev.x" syntax when there is no 1.1 branch.

  • 1.1.0-dev.3/ and 1.1.0-dev.4 have no associated commits. How could that be?

  • I see git history for these 1.1 versions that do not appear on bayes. How could that be?

1.1.3-rc.2 => @zepumph 6/28/18
1.1.3-phetiorc.2 => @zepumph 6/28/18
1.1.3-rc.4 => @jonathanolson 6/29/18
1.1.3-rc.5 => @jonathanolson 7/6/18

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions