Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
181 lines (124 loc) · 5.39 KB

File metadata and controls

181 lines (124 loc) · 5.39 KB

Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)

Purpose: Document significant architectural decisions for AI CLI Preparation Phase 2

What is an ADR?

An Architecture Decision Record (ADR) captures a single architectural decision along with its context, consequences, and rationale. ADRs help teams:

  • Understand why decisions were made
  • Avoid revisiting settled decisions
  • Onboard new contributors quickly
  • Track architectural evolution over time

ADR Process

When to Create an ADR

Create an ADR when making decisions that:

  • Impact system architecture or design patterns
  • Affect multiple components or modules
  • Have long-term consequences
  • Involve trade-offs between competing approaches
  • May be questioned or revisited in the future

ADR Template

# ADR-NNN: Title

**Status:** Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-XXX
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Deciders:** List of people involved in decision
**Tags:** keyword1, keyword2

## Context

What is the issue we're trying to solve? What are the constraints? What alternatives did we consider?

## Decision

What decision did we make? Be specific and actionable.

## Rationale

Why did we choose this approach? What factors influenced the decision?

## Consequences

### Positive
- What benefits does this decision bring?

### Negative
- What downsides or trade-offs exist?

### Neutral
- What side effects are neither good nor bad?

## Alternatives Considered

### Alternative 1: Name
- Description
- Pros
- Cons
- Why rejected

## Implementation Notes

Any specific guidance for implementation?

## References

- Links to related docs, RFCs, issues, etc.

ADR Lifecycle

  1. Proposed: Draft created, under discussion
  2. Accepted: Decision finalized, ready for implementation
  3. Deprecated: No longer valid but kept for historical context
  4. Superseded: Replaced by newer ADR (link to replacement)

Modifying ADRs

ADRs are immutable once accepted. To change a decision:

  1. Create a new ADR that supersedes the old one
  2. Update the old ADR's status: Superseded by ADR-XXX
  3. Link the new ADR back to the old one in References

Index of ADRs

Phase 2: Installation and Upgrade Management

ADR Title Status Date Tags
001 Context-Aware Installation Modes Accepted 2025-10-09 installation, environment-detection
002 Package Manager Preference Hierarchy Accepted 2025-10-09 package-managers, installation
003 Parallel Installation Approach Accepted 2025-10-09 reconciliation, installation
004 Always-Latest Version Policy Accepted 2025-10-09 versioning, upgrades
005 Environment Detection Logic Accepted 2025-10-09 environment-detection, context-aware
006 Configuration File Format Accepted 2025-10-09 configuration, yaml
007 Generic Tool Installation Architecture Accepted 2026-02-25 installation, catalog, generic-installer
008 Makefile Pattern Target Fallback Chain Accepted 2026-02-25 makefile, installation, pattern-targets

Quick Reference

By Category

Installation Strategy:

  • ADR-001: Context-Aware Installation Modes
  • ADR-002: Package Manager Preference Hierarchy
  • ADR-003: Parallel Installation Approach
  • ADR-007: Generic Tool Installation Architecture
  • ADR-008: Makefile Pattern Target Fallback Chain

Version Management:

  • ADR-004: Always-Latest Version Policy

Environment and Configuration:

  • ADR-005: Environment Detection Logic
  • ADR-006: Configuration File Format

By Tag

installation: ADR-001, ADR-002, ADR-003, ADR-007, ADR-008 environment-detection: ADR-001, ADR-005 versioning: ADR-004 configuration: ADR-006 reconciliation: ADR-003 package-managers: ADR-002 catalog: ADR-007 makefile: ADR-008 pattern-targets: ADR-008 generic-installer: ADR-007


Contributing ADRs

Propose a New ADR

  1. Copy the ADR template above
  2. Number it sequentially (e.g., ADR-007)
  3. Write the ADR in docs/adr/ADR-NNN-title.md
  4. Set status to "Proposed"
  5. Submit for review (PR or discussion)
  6. Update this README index after acceptance

Review Process

  1. Technical Review: Validate technical soundness
  2. Stakeholder Review: Ensure alignment with project goals
  3. Consensus: Reach agreement among deciders
  4. Acceptance: Update status to "Accepted", merge

Best Practices

  • Be Specific: Avoid vague decisions like "use best practices"
  • Document Trade-offs: Explain what you're giving up
  • Link Evidence: Reference benchmarks, docs, RFCs
  • Keep Concise: Aim for 1-2 pages per ADR
  • Use Examples: Concrete examples clarify abstract decisions

Related Documentation


Last Updated: 2026-02-25 Maintainer: AI CLI Preparation Team