Is there an existing issue for this?
Contact Details
No response
What should this feature add?
Currently when multiuser mode is active, all user-created boards are strictly private. They are entirely isolated from each other.
I would like it to be possible to designate a board as one of "Private," "Shared," or "Public".
- Private board -- Only visible to the user who created it.
- Shared board -- Visible to all users. Read/Write for the user who created it (they can add images to it and delete images from it). Read-only for other users.
- Public board -- Visible and Read/Write to all users.
The Administrator should continue to be able to see all boards created by all users and have read/write access to them.
There is code in the lstein/feature/workflow-isolation-in-multiuser-mode that enables sharing of workflows. I have designated this branch as the base for this pull request.
In terms of user interface, try adding a discrete pulldown menu to the right of the board's name can be used to choose among the three board types. Something small like a caret (^) mark, and badges that appear when the board is shared or public.
Alternatives
No response
Additional Content
No response
Is there an existing issue for this?
Contact Details
No response
What should this feature add?
Currently when multiuser mode is active, all user-created boards are strictly private. They are entirely isolated from each other.
I would like it to be possible to designate a board as one of "Private," "Shared," or "Public".
The Administrator should continue to be able to see all boards created by all users and have read/write access to them.
There is code in the
lstein/feature/workflow-isolation-in-multiuser-modethat enables sharing of workflows. I have designated this branch as the base for this pull request.In terms of user interface, try adding a discrete pulldown menu to the right of the board's name can be used to choose among the three board types. Something small like a caret (^) mark, and badges that appear when the board is shared or public.
Alternatives
No response
Additional Content
No response