Hi,
Do you think if it would be better to rename the second parameter width to length in *thumbnail related methods?
For me, at the first glance, the name width in documents/code appears like the standard length in x axis strictly. And it misleads when the methods take higher side in consideration and create a 100x200px thumbnail for 400x800px vertical image when width = 200 is specified (with width = 200, it seems as a thumbnail with 200px length in x axis).
Thank you
Hi,
Do you think if it would be better to rename the second parameter
widthtolengthin*thumbnailrelated methods?For me, at the first glance, the name
widthin documents/code appears like the standard length in x axis strictly. And it misleads when the methods take higher side in consideration and create a 100x200px thumbnail for 400x800px vertical image whenwidth = 200is specified (withwidth = 200, it seems as a thumbnail with 200px length in x axis).Thank you