Problem
On the Sponsors section of /conf/2026/, the visual hierarchy across tiers is inconsistent:
- Gold and Silver logos can render visually larger than the Platinum logo (Meta), because every non-Meta logo is forced into a fixed
aspect-[3] box while Meta is constrained by aspect-video.
- Logos with internal SVG whitespace (Meta, airbnb) end up looking smaller than peers in their tier.
- Logos with very different intrinsic aspect ratios within the same tier (e.g. wide Apollo vs square-ish ChilliCream in Silver) don't feel comparable in visual weight — one fills the row, the other looks orphaned.
- On desktop, single-logo tiers (Platinum, Open Source Community Sponsor, Bronze) sit in the left column of the 2-column grid rather than centered on the section.
The recent #2401 addressed individual viewBox padding but didn't fix the cross-tier hierarchy.
Expected
Tier hierarchy should always read Platinum > Gold > Silver / Community > Bronze at any viewport, and logos within a tier should feel comparable in visual weight regardless of their natural aspect ratio.
Proposal
Replace the fixed aspect-[3] approach with per-tier max-h / max-w envelopes (and small per-logo overrides where intrinsic shapes are extreme), plus a flex-centered row layout so single-logo tiers center properly.
Happy to open a PR.
Problem
On the Sponsors section of
/conf/2026/, the visual hierarchy across tiers is inconsistent:aspect-[3]box while Meta is constrained byaspect-video.The recent #2401 addressed individual viewBox padding but didn't fix the cross-tier hierarchy.
Expected
Tier hierarchy should always read Platinum > Gold > Silver / Community > Bronze at any viewport, and logos within a tier should feel comparable in visual weight regardless of their natural aspect ratio.
Proposal
Replace the fixed
aspect-[3]approach with per-tiermax-h/max-wenvelopes (and small per-logo overrides where intrinsic shapes are extreme), plus a flex-centered row layout so single-logo tiers center properly.Happy to open a PR.