You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Do you think it is fair to charge Opus requests 300% in premium requests, given that on Amazon Bedrock or Anthropic’s own pricing for Opus 4.5 is around 165% more than Sonnet 4.5?
.
.
.
.
Context on No. This should be charged at 1x:
No. This should be charged at 1x , given GitHub’s generous profit margin since there is no mechanism to carry over unused requests between months, nor any ability to share quotas across users within the same Copilot Business/Enterprise subscription.
Do you think it is fair to charge Opus requests at 3x the premium rate ?
No, this should be 2x
16%
Yes
0%
No. This should be charged at 1x (See context in body)
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Do you think it is fair to charge Opus requests 300% in premium requests, given that on Amazon Bedrock or Anthropic’s own pricing for Opus 4.5 is around 165% more than Sonnet 4.5?
.
.
.
.
Context on No. This should be charged at 1x:
No. This should be charged at 1x , given GitHub’s generous profit margin since there is no mechanism to carry over unused requests between months, nor any ability to share quotas across users within the same Copilot Business/Enterprise subscription.6 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions