If you crate is used together with rstest's parametrized tests feature, the directory created by testdir!() in one parametrized test function collides with the one created in a different parametrized test function.
Expected Behaviour
I would expect that the PathBuf returned by testdir!() is always unique and new, and never collides with one created in a different testing function.
Actual Behaviour
If two rstest test function have multiple cases, rstest names the test cases func1::case1, func1::case2 for test function func1, and fun2::case1, func2::case2 for the second one. Tempdir thinks that case1, case2 are the names of the test functions, which are however not unique in a module. This leads to a reuse of the test dir.
Reproduce
Run the unit tests in the following MVE (requires rstest) using cargo test -- --nocapture.
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use rstest::{fixture, rstest};
use std::path::PathBuf;
use testdir::testdir;
#[rstest]
#[case(1)]
#[case(2)]
#[case(3)]
fn test_1(#[case] _num: u8) {
let out = testdir!();
println!("Creating new tmp_dir {}", out.display());
}
#[rstest]
#[case(1)]
#[case(2)]
#[case(3)]
fn test_2(#[case] _num: u8) {
let out = testdir!();
println!("Creating new tmp_dir {}", out.display());
}
}
I understand that this issue is related to the interplay of your crate with another one. But since rstest is rather popular, it would be great if both would play well together.
Having had a quick lock at the code, it seems like the crate::private::extract_test_name would need to be improved and return testfunc::caseN instead of just caseN for parametrized tests.
What do you think?
If you crate is used together with rstest's parametrized tests feature, the directory created by
testdir!()in one parametrized test function collides with the one created in a different parametrized test function.Expected Behaviour
I would expect that the
PathBufreturned bytestdir!()is always unique and new, and never collides with one created in a different testing function.Actual Behaviour
If two rstest test function have multiple cases, rstest names the test cases
func1::case1,func1::case2for test functionfunc1, andfun2::case1,func2::case2for the second one. Tempdir thinks thatcase1,case2are the names of the test functions, which are however not unique in a module. This leads to a reuse of the test dir.Reproduce
Run the unit tests in the following MVE (requires rstest) using
cargo test -- --nocapture.I understand that this issue is related to the interplay of your crate with another one. But since rstest is rather popular, it would be great if both would play well together.
Having had a quick lock at the code, it seems like the
crate::private::extract_test_namewould need to be improved and returntestfunc::caseNinstead of justcaseNfor parametrized tests.What do you think?