Prioritise the use of tools dedicated to Wayland in environments where a composer related to it operates #2241
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
What are you talking about bro? Fastfetch never uses xdriinfo, xdpyinfo, xprop, xrandr, etc. What distro are you using? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Then it doesn't! I thought I could deduce it does as a sum on Fedora of those outputs: which if any tool must be able to fetch reliable values, then by comparing the output to which then is revealing that "15" especially and "60 Hz" are inaccurate since rounded, and finally with from which I concluded this tool too might use those X11 tools since fetching inaccurate values. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Let it be. Making values accurate one by one you are instructing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello. The GNOME Project has gone Wayland-protocol-only, removing the X11 back-end from Mutter, GNOME’s compositor and window manager. It still keeps alive the Xwayland support for those users that still nowadays wish to run X11 clients under Wayland.
On my system, '
rpm -qR fastfetch' allows me to deduce that fastfetch likely relies solely on X11 clients to fetch strings related to certain modules; for instance, Display and Monitor, viaxdriinfo,xdpyinfo,xprop, andxrandr. However, an X11 client cannot compete with a dedicated Wayland tool, e.g. likewayland-inforegarding the reliability of the information source on a system using a Wayland composer.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions