-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Description
Hello,
I have a few questions about calculating iHS:
-
The original iHS paper (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040072) calculated raw iHS by ln(iHH_ancestral/iHH_derived), but here, iHS is calculated by ln(iHH_derived/iHH_ancestral), so that positive iHS value means positive selection on the derived allele. Can you confirm if my understanding is correct?
-
Is it necessary to know which allele is the ancestral allele and which is the derived allele to calculate the iHS? For example, a SNP has two alleles A and B, but I don't know which one is the ancestral/derived allele. If I calculate raw iHS by ln(iHH_A/iHH_B) and the standardized iHS is positive, can I just say A is under positive selection?
-
Thank you so much for sharing your pre-calculated iHS here (https://datashare.ed.ac.uk/handle/10283/714). I wonder when you calculate those iHS, did you decide which allele is ancestral allele and which is derived allele first, and then always do ln(iHH_derived/iHH_ancestral) when calculating iHS? Or did you just use the reference/alternative coding provided by the 1000 Genome Project, and do ln(iHH_alternative/iHH_reference) ?
Thanks a lot!
Siliang