Request: Put "name:" first in the build matrices?

[anjohnson]

I have been editing the GHA configurations for Base and its submodules for quite some time to move the name field first in the build matrices (on the same line as the leading "-" for the block). I find the result makes it much easier to immediately see which build is being specified in each block as the name coming first summarizes it, and this also allows any of the lines setting other parameters to be copy/pasted to other blocks without having to worry about adding/removing the "-" character.

Compare:

          - os: ubuntu-22.04
            cmp: gcc
            configuration: default
            base: "3.15"
            wine: "64"
            name: "3.15 Ub-22 gcc + MinGW"

          - os: ubuntu-22.04
            cmp: gcc
            configuration: static
            base: "7.0"
            extra: "CMD_CXXFLAGS=-std=c++11"
            name: "7.0 Ub-22 gcc C++11, static"

with

          - name: "7.0 Ub gcc C++11, static"
            base: "7.0"
            os: ubuntu-latest
            cmp: gcc
            configuration: static
            extra: "CMD_CXXFLAGS=-std=c++11"

          - name: "7.0 Ub gcc u-char"
            base: "7.0"
            os: ubuntu-latest
            cmp: gcc
            configuration: static
            extra: "CMD_CFLAGS=-funsigned-char CMD_CXXFLAGS=-funsigned-char"

I'm willing to create a PR with those changes to all the examples here if there is agreement that this is a good idea, and that we should try to keep this order.

[ralphlange]

I'm fine with that.
I'm fine with any order, actually...

I think, at one time I was copying from the GHA documentation and thought it was important which was first in the list...