The CLI header currently displays only a single model string, but the runtime uses separate models for planning (ACTION_PLAN_MODEL) and general/default responses (DEFAULT_MODEL). This makes it unclear which model is active for each stage. We should surface both or clearly indicate which model is in use during planning vs. response synthesis in the CLI header.
The CLI header currently displays only a single model string, but the runtime uses separate models for planning (ACTION_PLAN_MODEL) and general/default responses (DEFAULT_MODEL). This makes it unclear which model is active for each stage. We should surface both or clearly indicate which model is in use during planning vs. response synthesis in the CLI header.