Skip to content

primitive library #306

@konsumlamm

Description

@konsumlamm

I plan to make a MicroHs version of the primitive package. It mostly consists of wrappers around primitive types and functions (arrays, mutable references, pointers). Since the implementation is very compiler dependent, I don't think it makes much sense to modify the original version. However, MicroHs should already provide all the necessary tools for a reimplementation. Now my question is: Should this be included with MicroHs itself (like bytestring etc.) or in a separate primitive-mhs package?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions