map validation suggestion

[illwieckz]

One thing we may want to validate is map dpk.

If we don't decide to avoid delta paks for maps,

for every map-name_version.dpk, if there is a maps/name.bsp file:

• maps/name.map file,
• maps/name/lm_*.webp files, at least two, always even (light map + deluxe map),
• minimaps/name.minimap file
• minimaps/name.crn file

If we decide to avoid delta paks for maps,

for every map-name_version.dpk:

• maps/name.bsp file,
• maps/name.map file,
• maps/name/lm_*.webp files, at least two, always even (light map + deluxe map),
• minimaps/name.minimap file
• minimaps/name.crn file
• meta/name/name.arena file
• meta/name/name.crn file

[illwieckz]

I updated the list above, especially I removed navmeshes from the list.

[slipher]

If we want to support delta paks for maps we would need to fix Unvanquished/Unvanquished#2225.

[illwieckz]

We don't plan to ship delta paks of maps anymore. It's good to keep maps standalone.

What we may add to the map validation is the absence of netradiant byproducts, like .map.bak and other things like that.

Since I always build the released maps with Urcheon and it takes care of that we never faced that problem, but we can be explicit.