Skip to content

Commit cc75fbb

Browse files
SoundBlasterSoundBlaster
authored
Merge pull request #77 from SoundBlaster/codex/docs-migration-kit
Documentation refactoring
2 parents b8b90f5 + 1c3239d commit cc75fbb

13 files changed

Lines changed: 2689 additions & 183 deletions

‎AGENTS_DOCS/COMMANDS/ARCHIVE.md‎

Lines changed: 252 additions & 54 deletions
Large diffs are not rendered by default.

‎AGENTS_DOCS/COMMANDS/NEW.md‎

Lines changed: 598 additions & 0 deletions
Large diffs are not rendered by default.

DOCS/COMMANDS/SELECT_NEXT.md renamed to AGENTS_DOCS/COMMANDS/SELECT_NEXT.md

File renamed without changes.

DOCS/COMMANDS/START.md renamed to AGENTS_DOCS/COMMANDS/START.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Create `Summary_of_Work.md` capturing:
7979
- [ ] Progress trackers updated
8080
- [ ] `Summary_of_Work.md` created
8181

82-
Once complete, the task is ready for archival using `AGENTS_DOCS/COMMANDS/ARCHIVE.md`.
82+
Once complete, the task is ready for archival using [`ARCHIVE.md`](ARCHIVE.md).
8383

8484
### Step 7. Finalize
8585
- Run `swift build` and `swift test` from the repository root to verify the package.

‎AGENTS_DOCS/INPROGRESS/2025-11-19_NextTask_DocC_Migration.md‎

Lines changed: 259 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
1+
# Next Task — DocC Documentation Migration to SpecificationCore
2+
3+
## Selection Metadata
4+
- **Selection Date:** 2025-11-19
5+
- **Chosen Task:** Migrate DocC documentation from SpecificationKit to SpecificationCore for all Core types
6+
- **Source Backlog Entries:**
7+
- `AGENTS_DOCS/markdown/00_SpecificationKit_TODO.md` lines 96–102 (Section 9: Documentation, P1 task)
8+
- **Status:** Selected / Ready for implementation
9+
- **Blocking Issues:** None
10+
11+
---
12+
13+
## Candidate Review
14+
15+
### Evaluated Options
16+
17+
**Option 1: DocC Migration to SpecificationCore (P1)** ✅ SELECTED
18+
- **Source:** `00_SpecificationKit_TODO.md` lines 96-102
19+
- **Priority:** P1 (explicitly marked)
20+
- **Planning Status:** Complete (3 documents, 883 lines of planning)
21+
- **Dependencies:** All satisfied
22+
- SpecificationCore package exists ✓
23+
- SpecificationCore builds successfully ✓
24+
- Planning artifacts complete ✓
25+
- SpecificationKit has 17 DocC files to reference ✓
26+
- **Effort:** 2-3 days (30 hours estimated)
27+
- **Value:** Critical for SpecificationCore adoption and discoverability
28+
29+
**Option 2: GitHub Actions workflow setup**
30+
- **Source:** `00_SpecificationKit_TODO.md` line 108
31+
- **Priority:** Unspecified (P2-P3 estimated)
32+
- **Planning Status:** None
33+
- **Dependencies:** Unknown
34+
- **Effort:** Unknown
35+
- **Value:** CI/CD infrastructure improvement
36+
- **Reason not selected:** No planning, lower priority, would need scoping first
37+
38+
**Option 3: Optional DocC target setup**
39+
- **Source:** `00_SpecificationKit_TODO.md` line 109
40+
- **Priority:** Optional (P3)
41+
- **Planning Status:** None
42+
- **Dependencies:** Likely depends on Option 1
43+
- **Effort:** Unknown
44+
- **Value:** May be redundant with Option 1
45+
- **Reason not selected:** Marked optional, lowest priority
46+
47+
**Blocked Option: macOS Benchmark Baselines**
48+
- **Source:** `00_SpecificationKit_TODO.md` line 117, `blocked.md` lines 5-28
49+
- **Status:** Blocked - requires macOS hardware access
50+
- **Reason not selected:** Not currently executable
51+
52+
### Why this task now
53+
54+
**1. Highest Priority (P1)**
55+
- Only P1 item in the backlog
56+
- Explicitly prioritized over other documentation work
57+
58+
**2. Complete Planning**
59+
- Comprehensive planning document with 5 phases
60+
- PRD with requirements and user stories
61+
- Summary report with scope analysis
62+
- Total: 883 lines of planning artifacts
63+
64+
**3. Critical for Core Adoption**
65+
- SpecificationCore (26+ types) has no documentation
66+
- Developers cannot discover Core APIs
67+
- Learning resources are in wrong package
68+
- Clear Core vs Kit distinction needed
69+
70+
**4. All Dependencies Met**
71+
- SpecificationCore package exists and builds
72+
- SpecificationKit has reference documentation
73+
- All prerequisites from SpecificationCore separation complete
74+
75+
**5. No Blockers**
76+
- Not waiting on external dependencies
77+
- Not waiting on hardware or infrastructure
78+
- Not waiting on other task completions
79+
- Can start immediately
80+
81+
**6. High ROI**
82+
- Enables Core-only usage (reduces dependencies)
83+
- Improves developer experience
84+
- Clarifies package boundaries
85+
- Documentation-only task (no code risk)
86+
87+
---
88+
89+
## Implementation Notes
90+
91+
### Entry Points / Files to Inspect
92+
93+
**SpecificationKit Documentation (Reference):**
94+
- `Sources/SpecificationKit/Documentation.docc/` — Existing DocC catalog structure
95+
- `Sources/SpecificationKit/Documentation.docc/SpecificationKit.md` — Landing page pattern
96+
- `Sources/SpecificationKit/Documentation.docc/Tutorials/` — Tutorial structure (3 files)
97+
- 14 existing article files — Reference for style and format
98+
99+
**SpecificationCore Package (Target):**
100+
- `Sources/SpecificationCore/` — Core types needing documentation (26+ public types)
101+
- Will create: `Sources/SpecificationCore/Documentation.docc/` — New DocC catalog
102+
- Will create: 26+ article files + 3+ tutorials
103+
104+
**Planning Documents (Guidance):**
105+
- `AGENTS_DOCS/INPROGRESS/DocC_Migration_Planning.md` — Detailed implementation plan
106+
- `AGENTS_DOCS/SpecificationCore_PRD/DocC_Migration_PRD.md` — Requirements and user stories
107+
- `AGENTS_DOCS/INPROGRESS/DocC_Migration_Summary.md` — Scope and findings
108+
- `AGENTS_DOCS/INPROGRESS/Summary_of_Work.md` — What was migrated to Core
109+
110+
### Acceptance Thoughts
111+
112+
**Task is "done" when:**
113+
114+
1. **SpecificationCore Documentation Complete**
115+
- [ ] `Documentation.docc/` directory created with proper structure
116+
- [ ] Landing page (`SpecificationCore.md`) with quick start examples
117+
- [ ] 26+ article files for all Core types (protocols, specs, wrappers, macros)
118+
- [ ] Minimum 3 Core-focused tutorials
119+
- [ ] All code examples compile and run
120+
- [ ] `swift package generate-documentation --target SpecificationCore` succeeds
121+
122+
2. **SpecificationKit Documentation Updated**
123+
- [ ] Core-related documentation removed from SpecificationKit
124+
- [ ] `SpecificationKit.md` references SpecificationCore appropriately
125+
- [ ] Kit tutorials updated to remove Core-only content
126+
- [ ] `swift package generate-documentation --target SpecificationKit` succeeds
127+
128+
3. **Quality Criteria Met**
129+
- [ ] No broken links between packages
130+
- [ ] All cross-package references work correctly
131+
- [ ] Documentation style consistent throughout
132+
- [ ] Clear distinction between Core and Kit features
133+
- [ ] README files in both packages updated
134+
135+
4. **Validation Complete**
136+
- [ ] Both packages build documentation without warnings/errors
137+
- [ ] Manual review of generated documentation
138+
- [ ] All 26+ Core types have documentation coverage
139+
- [ ] Tutorial code examples tested and verified
140+
141+
5. **Deliverables Committed**
142+
- [ ] All new DocC files committed to git
143+
- [ ] Modified files committed
144+
- [ ] Summary_of_Work.md created documenting completion
145+
- [ ] Progress trackers updated
146+
147+
### Open Questions / Risks
148+
149+
**Questions to Address During Implementation:**
150+
151+
1. **Cross-Package Linking Syntax**
152+
- Q: What's the correct syntax for linking from Kit to Core docs?
153+
- Plan: Test ``` ``SpecificationCore/TypeName`` ``` early in Phase 2
154+
- Fallback: Use web URLs if symbol links don't work
155+
156+
2. **Asset Migration**
157+
- Q: Do existing diagrams/images apply to Core concepts?
158+
- Plan: Audit Resources/ in Phase 1, create new assets if needed
159+
- Fallback: Start text-only, add visuals as enhancement
160+
161+
3. **Tutorial Code Location**
162+
- Q: Should tutorial code be inline or in separate files?
163+
- Plan: Follow SpecificationKit pattern (reference external files)
164+
- Decision: Inline for short snippets, files for complete examples
165+
166+
4. **Inline Doc Comments**
167+
- Q: Should we add /// comments to all Core types?
168+
- Plan: Add comprehensive doc comments for public APIs
169+
- Benefit: Auto-generates symbol documentation
170+
171+
**Risks Identified:**
172+
173+
1. **Risk:** Cross-package linking may not work as expected
174+
- **Probability:** Low
175+
- **Impact:** Medium
176+
- **Mitigation:** Test linking syntax early, have fallback strategies
177+
178+
2. **Risk:** Tutorial code doesn't compile in Core context
179+
- **Probability:** Low
180+
- **Impact:** High
181+
- **Mitigation:** Test all examples incrementally, create minimal reproducible examples
182+
183+
3. **Risk:** Time overrun on article writing
184+
- **Probability:** Medium
185+
- **Impact:** Low
186+
- **Mitigation:** Focus on critical types first (protocols, basic specs), iterate on polish
187+
188+
4. **Risk:** Asset organization becomes complex
189+
- **Probability:** Low
190+
- **Impact:** Low
191+
- **Mitigation:** Start without images, add as enhancement phase
192+
193+
---
194+
195+
## Immediate Next Actions
196+
197+
1. **Begin Phase 1: Documentation Audit** (4 hours)
198+
- Read all 14 .md files in SpecificationKit Documentation.docc
199+
- Read all 3 .tutorial files
200+
- Create audit matrix: File → Category (Core/Kit/Shared) → Action (Migrate/Keep/Delete)
201+
- Identify code examples that reference Core types
202+
- List all Core types without documentation
203+
204+
2. **Phase 2: SpecificationCore DocC Setup** (2 hours)
205+
- Create `SpecificationCore/Sources/SpecificationCore/Documentation.docc/` directory
206+
- Create landing page `SpecificationCore.md` with quick start
207+
- Create `Resources/` subdirectory for future assets
208+
- Test: `swift package generate-documentation --target SpecificationCore`
209+
210+
3. **Phase 3: Core Documentation Migration** (12 hours)
211+
- Create 6 Core Protocols articles
212+
- Create 3 Context Infrastructure articles
213+
- Create 7 Basic Specifications articles
214+
- Create 4 Property Wrappers articles
215+
- Create 2 Macros articles
216+
- Add code examples to all articles
217+
218+
4. **Phase 4: Tutorial Creation** (8 hours)
219+
- Create "Getting Started with SpecificationCore" tutorial
220+
- Create "Composing Specifications" tutorial
221+
- Create "Working with Context Providers" tutorial
222+
- Ensure all tutorial code compiles
223+
224+
5. **Phase 5: Cleanup and Validation** (4 hours)
225+
- Remove Core-related docs from SpecificationKit
226+
- Update SpecificationKit.md cross-references
227+
- Build documentation for both packages
228+
- Fix any broken links or warnings
229+
- Create Summary_of_Work.md
230+
231+
---
232+
233+
## Task Tracking
234+
235+
**Related Planning Documents:**
236+
- Implementation Plan: `AGENTS_DOCS/INPROGRESS/DocC_Migration_Planning.md`
237+
- Requirements: `AGENTS_DOCS/SpecificationCore_PRD/DocC_Migration_PRD.md`
238+
- Summary: `AGENTS_DOCS/INPROGRESS/DocC_Migration_Summary.md`
239+
240+
**Progress Tracking:**
241+
- TODO: `AGENTS_DOCS/markdown/00_SpecificationKit_TODO.md` (line 96)
242+
- Will create: `AGENTS_DOCS/INPROGRESS/Summary_of_Work.md` (on completion)
243+
244+
**Success Metrics:**
245+
- Coverage: 100% of 26+ Core types documented
246+
- Tutorials: ≥ 3 Core-focused tutorials
247+
- Build: 100% clean (no warnings/errors)
248+
- Links: 0 broken cross-package links
249+
- Examples: ≥ 80% of articles have runnable code
250+
251+
---
252+
253+
## Ready for START.md
254+
255+
This task is now selected and ready for implementation via `START.md` command.
256+
257+
**Estimated Duration:** 2-3 days (30 hours)
258+
**Priority:** P1
259+
**Risk Level:** Low (documentation-only, no code changes)

‎AGENTS_DOCS/INPROGRESS/2025-11-20_NextTask_DocC_Migration.md‎

Lines changed: 67 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
1+
Phase 3 Complete - All Articles Created (23/23)
2+
3+
Core Protocols (6 articles)
4+
5+
✅ Specification.md
6+
✅ DecisionSpec.md
7+
✅ AsyncSpecification.md
8+
✅ ContextProviding.md
9+
✅ AnySpecification.md
10+
✅ SpecificationOperators.md
11+
12+
Context Infrastructure (3 articles)
13+
14+
✅ EvaluationContext.md
15+
✅ DefaultContextProvider.md
16+
✅ MockContextProvider.md
17+
18+
Basic Specifications (7 articles)
19+
20+
✅ PredicateSpec.md
21+
✅ FirstMatchSpec.md
22+
✅ MaxCountSpec.md
23+
✅ CooldownIntervalSpec.md
24+
✅ TimeSinceEventSpec.md
25+
✅ DateRangeSpec.md
26+
✅ DateComparisonSpec.md
27+
28+
Property Wrappers (4 articles)
29+
30+
✅ Satisfies.md
31+
✅ Decides.md
32+
✅ Maybe.md
33+
✅ AsyncSatisfies.md
34+
35+
Macros (2 articles)
36+
37+
✅ SpecsMacro.md (@specs)
38+
✅ AutoContextMacro.md (@AutoContext)
39+
40+
Each article includes comprehensive coverage with:
41+
- Overview and key benefits
42+
- Quick examples and usage patterns
43+
- Detailed API documentation
44+
- Real-world examples
45+
- Testing guidance
46+
- Best practices
47+
- Performance considerations
48+
- Cross-references
49+
50+
Next Phase: Tutorials
51+
52+
Phase 4 involves creating 3 tutorials (~8 hours estimated):
53+
1. Tutorials.tutorial (index/table of contents)
54+
2. GettingStartedCore.tutorial
55+
3. ComposingSpecifications.tutorial
56+
57+
This phase requires creating not just tutorial files but also:
58+
- Multiple code sample files for each tutorial step
59+
- Image assets for diagrams
60+
- Proper tutorial structure with sections and steps
61+
62+
Would you like me to:
63+
1. Continue with Phase 4 (tutorials) - This will take substantial time
64+
2. Move to Phase 5 (cleanup/validation) and skip tutorials for now
65+
3. Stop here and let you review the completed documentation
66+
67+
All work has been committed to the codex/docs-migration-core branch.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)