You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: wiki/robotics-project-guide/choose-a-sim.md
+19-30Lines changed: 19 additions & 30 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -184,17 +184,6 @@ For complex scenarios, users can enhance simulations by adding custom force mode
184
184
185
185
## Determining the Right Simulator for Your Project
186
186
187
-
Before selecting a simulator, consider the following questions:
188
-
189
-
-**Integration with ROS/ROS2**: Does your project utilize the Robot Operating System (ROS)? If so, compatibility is essential.
190
-
-**Physics Simulation**: Is accurate physics modeling necessary, especially for machine learning or reinforcement learning applications? Of course, accurate physics engine usually helps. But in some cases, it may suffice to just have a visualizer such as RViz or a low-fidelity physics engine.
191
-
-**Customizability**: Do you require the ability to create custom models or environments? If you built the robot yourself, then you would most likely want a way to simulate your custom robot. Luckily, most simulators provide a way to do this.
192
-
-**Budget Constraints**: Are there financial limitations that necessitate the use of free or open-source tools?
193
-
-**Operating System Compatibility**: What platforms does the simulator support (e.g., Windows, macOS, Linux)?
194
-
-**Visualization Requirements**: Do you need photorealistic rendering for tasks like computer vision? Even when you use computer vision, the chances are that you wouldn't need photorealistic rendering. As long as the simulator can render the environment to a certain standard for object detection, it should suffice.
195
-
196
-
## Determining the Right Simulator for Your Project
197
-
198
187
Before selecting a simulator, consider the following criteria:
199
188
200
189
### 1. Ecosystem and Compatibility
@@ -207,7 +196,7 @@ Before selecting a simulator, consider the following criteria:
207
196
***Visualization and Rendering:** If your project involves computer vision, evaluate the rendering engine. While object detection often only requires standard 3D rendering, tasks involving light-sensitive sensors or photorealistic sim-to-real transfer may require ray-tracing capabilities provided by platforms like NVIDIA Isaac Sim or Unity.
208
197
***Customizability:** Evaluate the ease of importing custom robot models (via URDF, MJCF, or USD) and procedurally generating environments. If you are developing unique hardware, the ability to accurately model its mass properties and joint limits is a non-negotiable requirement.
209
198
210
-
**Pro-Tip: **You can often circumvent these version mismatches by using Docker containers to run legacy ROS environments on a modern host OS, or by manually installing mainline kernels to support new hardware on older Ubuntu builds. However, the downside is added complexity: both of these may introduce networking issues, GUI X11 forwarding, overhead in GPU passthrough, real-time kernel issues, etc.
199
+
**Pro-Tip**: You can often circumvent these version mismatches by using Docker containers to run legacy ROS environments on a modern host OS, or by manually installing mainline kernels to support new hardware on older Ubuntu builds. However, the downside is added complexity: both of these may introduce networking issues, GUI X11 forwarding, overhead in GPU passthrough, real-time kernel issues, etc.
211
200
212
201
### 3. Sustainability and Maintenance
213
202
***Software Health and EOL:** For production environments, integrating simulators that lack updates for modern operating systems or hardware architectures may lead to technical dead-ends. Prioritize software that has reached a stable version and has not been flagged for **End-of-Life (EOL)**.
@@ -221,9 +210,9 @@ We first go over some popular simulators tailored for robotics applications.
| Gazebo | Yes | Best | Free | Moderate | Linux, macOS | Very High |
224
-
|AirSim | Yes | Limited | Free | Resource-Intensive | Windows, Linux | High (for drones) |
213
+
|Colosseum| Yes | Limited | Free | Resource-Intensive | Windows, Linux | High (for drones) |
225
214
| CoppeliaSim | Yes | Yes | Free*/Paid | Moderate | Windows, macOS, Linux | Very High |
226
-
| Unity | Adjustable | With Plugins | Free*/Paid | Variable | Windows, macOS, Linux | Very High |
215
+
| Unity | Adjustable | With Plugins | Free*/Paid | Variable | Windows, macOS, Linux | Very High |
227
216
228
217
*Free for personal or educational use; commercial licenses may apply.
229
218
@@ -232,6 +221,8 @@ We first go over some popular simulators tailored for robotics applications.
232
221
233
222
Gazebo is a widely-used open-source robotics simulator that offers robust physics simulation and sensor modeling capabilities. It provides a 3D environment where users can test and develop robots in realistic scenarios. Gazebo's integration with the Robot Operating System (ROS) makes it a standard choice for many robotics projects, facilitating seamless communication between simulation and real-world applications.
234
223
224
+
**Note**: It is important to distinguish between Gazebo Classic (versions 1-11) and the modern Gazebo (formerly Ignition). Gazebo Classic reached its official End-of-Life (EOL) in January 2025. You can read more about the switch [here](https://gazebosim.org/about).
225
+
235
226
**Pros**:
236
227
-**ROS Integration**: Seamless compatibility with ROS, making it a standard choice for many robotics projects.
237
228
-**Physics-Based**: Offers realistic physics simulations, including gravity, inertia, and collision detection.
@@ -243,9 +234,9 @@ Gazebo is a widely-used open-source robotics simulator that offers robust physic
243
234
-**Computation Speed**: Can be resource-intensive, potentially leading to slower simulations on less powerful hardware.
244
235
-**Learning Curve**: May require time to master its extensive features and functionalities.
245
236
246
-
### [AirSim (on Unity)](https://microsoft.github.io/AirSim/Unity/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
237
+
### [Colosseum (successor to AirSim)](https://codexlabsllc.github.io/Colosseum/)
Developed by Microsoft, AirSim is an open-source simulator designed primarily for drones and autonomous vehicles. Built on the Unreal Engine, it provides high-fidelity visuals and accurate physics modeling, making it suitable for machine learning and computer vision research. AirSim supports both software-in-the-loop and hardware-in-the-loop simulations, allowing for seamless transitions from virtual to real-world testing.
239
+
Originally developed by Microsoft and now maintained by the community under the Colosseum project, it is an open-source simulator designed for drones and autonomous vehicles. It is primarily built on Unreal Engine 5 (also supports Unity), providing photorealistic visuals and high-fidelity physics modeling essential for machine learning and computer vision research. Colosseum supports both software-in-the-loop (SITL) and hardware-in-the-loop (HITL) simulations with popular flight controllers like PX4 and ArduPilot, enabling reliable sim-to-real transitions.
249
240
250
241
**Pros**:
251
242
-**Photorealistic Visualization**: Built on Unreal Engine, providing high-fidelity visuals suitable for computer vision tasks.
@@ -298,18 +289,18 @@ As the field of robotics increasingly incorporates reinforcement learning (RL) t
OpenAI Gym is a widely-used toolkit for developing and comparing reinforcement learning algorithms. It provides a standardized API to interact with a variety of environments, ranging from simple tasks to complex simulations. Many RL training simulators are built upon the Gym framework, making it a foundational tool in the RL community.
312
-
OpenAI Gym itself is not a single physics engine or simulator. Instead, it’s a framework that provides a standardized API for a large collection of reinforcement learning environments. Many other RL simulators follow the conventions used in Gym.
302
+
Gymnasium is a widely-used toolkit for developing and comparing reinforcement learning algorithms. It provides a standardized API to interact with a variety of environments, ranging from simple tasks to complex simulations. Many RL training simulators are built upon the Gymnasium framework, making it a foundational tool in the RL community.
303
+
Gymnasium itself is not a single physics engine or simulator. Instead, it’s a framework that provides a standardized API for a large collection of reinforcement learning environments. Many other RL simulators follow the conventions used in Gymnasium.
313
304
314
305
**Pros**:
315
306
-**Standardized Interface**: Offers a consistent API across diverse environments, simplifying algorithm development.
@@ -323,10 +314,9 @@ OpenAI Gym itself is not a single physics engine or simulator. Instead, it’s a
323
314
-**Visualization**: Basic rendering capabilities; not suitable for photorealistic needs.
0 commit comments