Request contract reputation review – ERC-3009 TransferWithAuthorization (BluePay)

[zixxtech]

Your issue will be reviewed by a maintainer and labeled for further action.
To complete your request, follow the bot-actions to report this on the support E-mail box and follow the outlined steps. Alternatively, you can report this issue on the official web page to an agent for assistance.
@Luanxing

---

                          Issue Description 

Official Website

https://bluepay.jp/ https://merchant.bluepay.jp/

Affected Contracts

Polygon: 0x8c429857299885525e452897A8476d3Ec83c26C9

Avalanche: 0x349D3Af4b7614ACc4EA371EA8c12A681e9aFBC26

Description

MetaMask displays a warning that the contract involved in a TransferWithAuthorization signature is "untrusted".

This contract implements ERC-3009 (TransferWithAuthorization) as part of a compliant meta-transaction payment flow for regulated operations in Japan.

We believe this is a contract reputation issue rather than a phishing or malicious site issue, and we respectfully request a review.

Technical Characteristics

• ERC-3009 implementation
• Fixed transfer amount (no unlimited approval)
• Single-use nonce
• Short expiration window
• No seed phrase collection
• No arbitrary execution
• No hidden transaction broadcast

The signature is strictly used for controlled payment settlement.

Request

1. Review of the above contract addresses.
2. Clarification on whether ERC-3009 based meta-transactions
      are inherently treated as high-risk in MetaMask.
3. Guidance on what requirements must be satisfied to
      avoid the "untrusted contract" warning.

We are happy to provide source verification or additional documentation if required.

[github-actions]

For quick review and assistance, contact the hub agent on the live chat page to report your issue via Web Support page. Alternatively send an E-mail to report this via Gitactivemailbox@gmail.com to ensure total review with the technical support.

Team🚀