Use Case
I'm building my own container image based on ghcr.io/openvoxproject/openvoxserver:8 and need to run commands or fix file permissions for the user that is later owning the server process. I just assumed it is now called openvox but it is still named puppet.
Describe the solution you would like
The local user within the container should be named openvox or something neutral, not puppet. This also applies to other aspects that still default to puppet (e.g. CA_HOSTNAME). The project is no longer called "puppet", let's get rid of it.
Describe alternatives you've considered
If renaming the local user is not possible due to backwards compatibility concerns, maybe create an alias user with the same HOME and uID? Or document a stable the numeric user ID so it can be used in scripts instead? Or make the name configurable?
Additional context
I absolutely love what is currently happening with this project!
Use Case
I'm building my own container image based on
ghcr.io/openvoxproject/openvoxserver:8and need to run commands or fix file permissions for the user that is later owning the server process. I just assumed it is now calledopenvoxbut it is still namedpuppet.Describe the solution you would like
The local user within the container should be named
openvoxor something neutral, notpuppet. This also applies to other aspects that still default topuppet(e.g.CA_HOSTNAME). The project is no longer called "puppet", let's get rid of it.Describe alternatives you've considered
If renaming the local user is not possible due to backwards compatibility concerns, maybe create an alias user with the same HOME and uID? Or document a stable the numeric user ID so it can be used in scripts instead? Or make the name configurable?
Additional context
I absolutely love what is currently happening with this project!