I noticed there's a bit of ambiguity in these lines:
|
commaturnedabovecmb 0312 |
|
turnedabovecmb 0313 |
|
reversedcommaabovecmb 0314 |
|
turnedcommaabovecmb 0315 |
Namely, you have commaturnedabovecmb 0312 and turnedcommaabovecmb 0315: two names pointing to two different codepoints, but meaning exactly the same. turnedcommaabovecmb 0315 is actually U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT, so that name should be fixed.
Also turnedabovecmb 0313 is both ambiguous (doesn't say what exactly is turned) and incorrect (because it's not actually turned). The character is called U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE, so that name should also be fixed.
I noticed there's a bit of ambiguity in these lines:
glyphNameFormatter/Lib/glyphNameFormatter/names/glyphNamesToUnicode.txt
Lines 736 to 739 in 35779b5
Namely, you have
commaturnedabovecmb 0312andturnedcommaabovecmb 0315: two names pointing to two different codepoints, but meaning exactly the same.turnedcommaabovecmb 0315is actuallyU+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT, so that name should be fixed.Also
turnedabovecmb 0313is both ambiguous (doesn't say what exactly is turned) and incorrect (because it's not actually turned). The character is calledU+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE, so that name should also be fixed.