|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: "Session 14: CIP-68 NFT Standard" |
| 3 | +sidebar_label: Session |
| 4 | +sidebar_position: 1 |
| 5 | +slug: /working-group/q1-2026/sessions/14-cip-68-nft-standard/session-notes |
| 6 | +--- |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +# CIP-68 NFT Standard — Lecture Notes |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +## 1. Background |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +Early Cardano NFTs followed **CIP-25**, where metadata was stored in the minting transaction. |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +### Limitations of CIP-25 |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +- Metadata becomes **immutable after mint** |
| 17 | +- **Smart contracts cannot read metadata** |
| 18 | +- Difficult to build **dynamic or evolving NFTs** |
| 19 | +- Requires **off-chain infrastructure** for interpretation |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +To solve these limitations, Cardano introduced **CIP-68**, a modern NFT architecture enabling **programmable assets**. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +--- |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +# 2. Core Idea of CIP-68 |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +CIP-68 separates **NFT ownership** from **metadata storage**. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +Instead of minting a single token, a project mints **two tokens**: |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +### User NFT |
| 32 | +- Held in a user's wallet |
| 33 | +- Represents the actual NFT |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +### Reference NFT |
| 36 | +- Stored in a smart contract UTxO |
| 37 | +- Contains metadata in the **datum** |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +This structure allows metadata to be **read by smart contracts and updated if allowed by the script**. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +--- |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +# 3. Token Labels |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +CIP-68 uses labels defined in **CIP-67** to distinguish token types. |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +| Label | Purpose | |
| 48 | +|------|------| |
| 49 | +| 100 | Reference NFT (metadata holder) | |
| 50 | +| 222 | User NFT | |
| 51 | +| 333 | Fungible Token | |
| 52 | +| 444 | Rich Fungible Token | |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +Example: |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +``` |
| 57 | +(222)DragonSword |
| 58 | +(100)DragonSword |
| 59 | +``` |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +Both tokens share: |
| 62 | +- the same policy ID |
| 63 | +- the same asset name |
| 64 | +- but use different labels. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +# 4. Metadata Storage |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +Metadata is stored inside a datum attached to the UTxO holding the reference NFT. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +Example structure: |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +``` |
| 73 | +datum = [ |
| 74 | + metadata, |
| 75 | + version, |
| 76 | + extra |
| 77 | +] |
| 78 | +``` |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +Example metadata: |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +``` |
| 83 | +{ |
| 84 | + "name": "Dragon Sword", |
| 85 | + "image": "ipfs://Qm123...", |
| 86 | + "description": "Legendary weapon", |
| 87 | + "attributes": { |
| 88 | + "damage": 120, |
| 89 | + "rarity": "legendary" |
| 90 | + } |
| 91 | +} |
| 92 | +``` |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +Advantages: |
| 95 | +- Metadata lives on-chain |
| 96 | +- Smart contracts can read and validate metadata |
| 97 | +- Metadata can be updated under controlled conditions |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +# 5. Metadata Lookup Process |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +When a wallet encounters an NFT: |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +`policyID.(222)DragonSword` |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +The system derives the reference token: |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +`policyID.(100)DragonSword` |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +Then: |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +- 1. Locate the UTxO containing the reference NFT |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +- 2. Read the datum attached to that UTxO |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +- 3. Decode the metadata |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +This process ensures deterministic metadata discovery. |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +# 6. Smart NFT Capabilities |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +CIP-68 enables programmable NFTs. |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +Examples: |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +**Dynamic NFTs** |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +NFT attributes evolve over time. |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +``` |
| 132 | +level |
| 133 | +skills |
| 134 | +appearance |
| 135 | +``` |
| 136 | +**Membership NFTs** |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | +``` |
| 139 | +tier |
| 140 | +expiration date |
| 141 | +privileges |
| 142 | +``` |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +**Reputation NFTs** |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +``` |
| 147 | +DAO participation |
| 148 | +achievements |
| 149 | +contributions |
| 150 | +``` |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +**DeFi Position NFTs** |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +NFTs representing: |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +``` |
| 157 | +liquidity positions |
| 158 | +loans |
| 159 | +staking records |
| 160 | +``` |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | +# 7. Development Stack |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | +Typical Cardano NFT development stack: |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +**Smart Contracts** |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | +- Plutus V2 |
| 169 | +- Aiken |
| 170 | +- Helios |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +**SDKs** |
| 173 | +- Lucid |
| 174 | +- MeshJS |
| 175 | +- Cardano Serialization Library |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +**Infrastructure** |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +- Blockfrost |
| 180 | +- Ogmios |
| 181 | +- Kupo |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +**Storage** |
| 184 | + |
| 185 | +- IPFS |
| 186 | +- Arweave |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | +# 8. Minting Flow |
| 190 | + |
| 191 | +Modern NFT minting using CIP-68 follows these steps. |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | +1. Create Minting Policy |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | +Defines mint conditions. |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | +**Examples:** |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | +- one-time mint |
| 200 | +- time-locked mint |
| 201 | +- DAO-controlled mint |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +2. Mint Two Tokens |
| 204 | + |
| 205 | +For each NFT: |
| 206 | + |
| 207 | +``` |
| 208 | +(222)UserNFT |
| 209 | +(100)ReferenceNFT |
| 210 | +``` |
| 211 | + |
| 212 | +3. Lock Reference NFT |
| 213 | + |
| 214 | +Send the reference NFT to a script address. |
| 215 | +Attach metadata inside the datum. |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | +4. Distribute User NFT |
| 218 | + |
| 219 | +The user token (222) is sent to the buyer’s wallet. |
| 220 | +Wallets and marketplaces retrieve metadata from the reference NFT. |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | + |
| 223 | +# 9. Best Practices |
| 224 | + |
| 225 | +When designing NFT projects: |
| 226 | + |
| 227 | +**Decide Metadata Type:** |
| 228 | +- immutable |
| 229 | +- semi-dynamic |
| 230 | +- fully dynamic |
| 231 | + |
| 232 | +**Separate Components** |
| 233 | + |
| 234 | +Recommended architecture: |
| 235 | + |
| 236 | +- mint policy |
| 237 | +- metadata contract |
| 238 | +- application logic contract |
| 239 | + |
| 240 | +**Secure Metadata Updates** |
| 241 | + |
| 242 | +Ensure only authorized scripts can update metadata. |
| 243 | + |
| 244 | +**Store Media Off-Chain** |
| 245 | + |
| 246 | +Images and large files should be stored on: |
| 247 | + |
| 248 | +- IPFS |
| 249 | +- Arweave |
| 250 | + |
| 251 | +The blockchain should store references and hashes. |
| 252 | + |
| 253 | +# 10. When to Use CIP-68 |
| 254 | + |
| 255 | +Use CIP-68 when NFTs require: |
| 256 | + |
| 257 | +- dynamic metadata |
| 258 | +- smart contract interaction |
| 259 | +- on-chain logic |
| 260 | +- evolving assets |
| 261 | + |
| 262 | +Examples: |
| 263 | + |
| 264 | +- games |
| 265 | +- DAO memberships |
| 266 | +- DeFi positions |
| 267 | +- identity systems |
| 268 | + |
| 269 | +For simple static art collections, CIP-25 may still be sufficient. |
| 270 | + |
| 271 | +# 11. Summary |
| 272 | + |
| 273 | +CIP-68 introduces programmable NFTs to Cardano by: |
| 274 | + |
| 275 | +- separating ownership from metadata |
| 276 | +- storing metadata on-chain |
| 277 | +- enabling smart contract interaction |
| 278 | + |
| 279 | +This architecture forms the foundation for: |
| 280 | +- dynamic NFTs |
| 281 | +- decentralized identity |
| 282 | +- on-chain gaming assets |
| 283 | +- financial NFTs |
| 284 | + |
| 285 | +CIP-68 is now considered the modern standard for advanced NFT development on Cardano. |
0 commit comments