|
| 1 | +## Title |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Contributor Journey Optimization |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +## Patlet |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +New contributors often struggle to progress smoothly through the various stages of engagement in an InnerSource project, leading to high drop-off rates and underutilized potential. |
| 8 | +By systematically evaluating and optimizing the Contributor Journey, projects can identify and remove friction points, enabling a more inclusive and efficient path to higher-value contributions. |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +## Problem |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +Many InnerSource projects fail to retain and grow their contributor base because potential contributors encounter barriers at different stages of engagement. |
| 13 | +These barriers may include lack of awareness, unclear onboarding processes, missing documentation, or inadequate mentorship. |
| 14 | +Without deliberate intervention, these challenges reduce the number of contributors reaching the trusted committer stage, limiting the project's sustainability and impact. |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +## Context |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +This pattern applies to InnerSource projects that: |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +- Seek to attract and grow an engaged community of contributors. |
| 21 | +- Experience a high drop-off rate of potential contributors at various stages. |
| 22 | +- Have contributors who struggle to transition from users to active participants. |
| 23 | +- Recognize that reducing friction in contributor onboarding and progression can lead to a healthier, more sustainable project. |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +## Forces |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +- **Awareness Barrier** – Many potential contributors are unaware of the project or do not understand how it aligns with their needs or interests. |
| 28 | +- **Onboarding Complexity** – The process of contributing is not well-documented or too complex, discouraging new contributors. |
| 29 | +- **Skill Gap** – Some contributors may lack the necessary technical or collaboration skills, requiring additional support. |
| 30 | +- **Lack of Mentorship** – Without guidance from experienced contributors, new contributors struggle to navigate the project and make meaningful contributions. |
| 31 | +- **Recognition and Retention** – Contributors may feel unrecognized or unsupported, leading them to disengage before reaching the trusted committer stage. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +## Sketch (optional) |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +A visual representation of the Contributor Journey stages and common obstacles at each transition could be useful. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +## Solution |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +1. **Map the Contributor Journey** – Identify key stages in the contributor journey: awareness, usage, non-code contributions, code contributions, and trusted committer status. |
| 42 | +2. **Identify Friction Points** – Conduct workshops or self-assessments to document impediments preventing contributors from progressing. |
| 43 | +3. **Prioritize and Address Issues** – Create a backlog of improvement tasks, prioritizing high-impact changes such as better documentation, streamlined onboarding, mentorship programs, or automated contribution workflows. |
| 44 | +4. **Implement and Iterate** – Apply solutions in an incremental fashion, continuously gathering feedback and refining the process. |
| 45 | +5. **Measure Success** – Track engagement metrics, contributor retention rates, and qualitative feedback to assess improvements and adjust strategies as needed. |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +## Resulting Context |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +After implementing this pattern, projects experience: |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +- Increased contributor engagement and retention. |
| 52 | +- A clearer, more inclusive onboarding process. |
| 53 | +- Faster transition from new contributor to active participant. |
| 54 | +- Higher rates of trusted committers, strengthening the project’s long-term sustainability. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +## Rationale |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +By proactively identifying and addressing barriers at each stage of the Contributor Journey, projects can maximize both the value they gain from contributors and the value contributors gain from participation. |
| 59 | +An optimized journey fosters a thriving InnerSource community, leading to better collaboration and more sustainable projects. |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +## Known Instances |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +- Large software organizations with mature InnerSource programs have applied structured contributor journey workshops to boost engagement. |
| 64 | +- Open source communities often adopt similar strategies to improve contributor experience and retention. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +## Status |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +- Initial |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +## Author(s) |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +- Guilherme Dellagustin |
| 73 | +- Sebastian Spier |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +## Acknowledgments |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +- TBD |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +## Alias |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +- Contributor Onboarding Optimization |
| 82 | +- Contributor Engagement Framework |
0 commit comments