-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
GLOWS L3 metadata updates #92
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
Data Release 1See - https://lasp.colorado.edu/galaxy/spaces/IMAP/pages/324168272/Public+ReleasesSee - https://lasp.colorado.edu/galaxy/spaces/IMAP/pages/324168272/Public+ReleasesIns: GLOWSRelated to the GLOWS instrumentRelated to the GLOWS instrumentRelease BlockerNeeds to be addressed before (next) public releaseNeeds to be addressed before (next) public release
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Data Release 1See - https://lasp.colorado.edu/galaxy/spaces/IMAP/pages/324168272/Public+ReleasesSee - https://lasp.colorado.edu/galaxy/spaces/IMAP/pages/324168272/Public+ReleasesIns: GLOWSRelated to the GLOWS instrumentRelated to the GLOWS instrumentRelease BlockerNeeds to be addressed before (next) public releaseNeeds to be addressed before (next) public release
Type
Projects
Status
Todo
This is the list of ISTP metadata that needs to be changed for GLOWS L3.
Bold need GLOWS team input. Others are informational or Menlo can handle directly.
general
no_plotexplicitly on a bunch of the support_data. I'm going to not worry about that for now...it's additional noise in my checker but not strictly wrongL3a
spin_angleis RV and of dimensionality 0, which is failing validation--i.e. it is implicitly dimensioned (time,) but of size 81. Either this needs to be RV and have DEPEND_0 on epoch and then dimensionality 1 (time, 81), or it needs to be NRV and dimensionality 1 (81,). Same forspin_angle_delta. Do we expect this to be constant with time?flight_software_versionis INT4; it should be CHAR (even if numerical)L3b
No changes
L3c
No changes
L3d
uv_anisotropyhas several records with value-1. I'm guessing this is a fill / flag value. Maybe the most straightforward thing is for the wrapping code to replace-1with the standard fill-1e31-- EDIT: no change needed, see commentsL3e
elongationinhi-45has VALIDMAX and VALIDMIN of 135. Do we expect this to actually change? It's 90 for hi-90. I think it makes the most sense to use 0 as VALIDMIN and 180 as VALIDMAX -- yes Hi-45 is unlikely to not be 135, but maybe we'll discover it's 134 or something. 0-180 is used forelongation_excludedin Ultra. EDIT -- do thisprogram_versionis a variable. Does it make more sense for this to be a global attribute? -- EDIT: no changesurv_probLABL_PTR_2isHEALPix_index_label. The actual variable ishealpix_index_label(no caps).