|
178 | 178 |
|
179 | 179 | \textbf{Preskill (NISQ paradigm):} |
180 | 180 | \[ |
181 | | -\text{prepare an } n\text{-qubit state and measure all qubits} [oai_citation:0‡arXiv](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.00862?utm_source=chatgpt.com) |
| 181 | +\text{prepare an } n\text{-qubit state and measure all qubits}, see \url{https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.00862} |
182 | 182 | \] |
183 | 183 | \end{frame} |
184 | 184 |
|
|
228 | 228 | \end{proof} |
229 | 229 | \end{frame} |
230 | 230 |
|
231 | | -%------------------------------------------------ |
232 | | - |
233 | | -\begin{frame}{Summary} |
234 | | -\begin{itemize} |
235 | | -\item Quantum information is inherently \textbf{non-local} |
236 | | -\item Single-qubit measurement loses correlations |
237 | | -\item Mapping observables increases circuit depth |
238 | | -\item Modern hardware supports parallel measurement |
239 | | -\item NISQ algorithms rely on full bitstring sampling |
240 | | -\end{itemize} |
241 | | - |
242 | | -\medskip |
243 | | - |
244 | | -\begin{block}{Key insight} |
245 | | -Quantum computing is fundamentally about sampling high-dimensional distributions, not extracting single bits. |
246 | | -\end{block} |
247 | | -\end{frame} |
248 | | - |
249 | | -%------------------------------------------------ |
250 | | - |
251 | | -\end{document} |
252 | | - |
253 | | - |
254 | | -% !TEX program = pdflatex |
255 | | -\documentclass[aspectratio=169]{beamer} |
256 | | - |
257 | | -\usetheme{Madrid} |
258 | | -\usecolortheme{default} |
259 | | - |
260 | | -\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,mathtools} |
261 | | -\usepackage{physics} |
262 | | -\usepackage{listings} |
263 | | -\usepackage{xcolor} |
264 | | - |
265 | | -\lstset{ |
266 | | -language=Python, |
267 | | -basicstyle=\ttfamily\small, |
268 | | -keywordstyle=\color{blue}, |
269 | | -commentstyle=\color{gray}, |
270 | | -stringstyle=\color{red}, |
271 | | -showstringspaces=false, |
272 | | -breaklines=true |
273 | | -} |
274 | | - |
275 | | -\title{Measurement Strategies in VQE} |
276 | | -\subtitle{Failure of Single-Qubit Measurement and Numerical Evidence} |
277 | | -\author{} |
278 | | -\date{} |
279 | | - |
280 | | -\begin{document} |
281 | | - |
282 | | -\begin{frame} |
283 | | -\titlepage |
284 | | -\end{frame} |
285 | | - |
286 | | -%------------------------------------------------ |
287 | 231 |
|
288 | 232 | \begin{frame}{Key question} |
289 | 233 | \begin{block}{Problem} |
|
564 | 508 | \end{block} |
565 | 509 | \end{frame} |
566 | 510 |
|
| 511 | + |
| 512 | + |
| 513 | +%------------------------------------------------ |
| 514 | + |
| 515 | +\begin{frame}{Summary} |
| 516 | +\begin{itemize} |
| 517 | +\item Quantum information is inherently \textbf{non-local} |
| 518 | +\item Single-qubit measurement loses correlations |
| 519 | +\item Mapping observables increases circuit depth |
| 520 | +\item Modern hardware supports parallel measurement |
| 521 | +\item NISQ algorithms rely on full bitstring sampling |
| 522 | +\end{itemize} |
| 523 | + |
| 524 | +\medskip |
| 525 | + |
| 526 | +\begin{block}{Key insight} |
| 527 | +Quantum computing is fundamentally about sampling high-dimensional distributions, not extracting single bits. |
| 528 | +\end{block} |
| 529 | +\end{frame} |
| 530 | + |
567 | 531 | %------------------------------------------------ |
568 | 532 |
|
569 | 533 | \end{document} |
570 | 534 |
|
571 | 535 |
|
| 536 | + |
572 | 537 | %------------------------------------------------ |
573 | 538 |
|
574 | 539 | \begin{frame}{Full VQE optimization experiment} |
|
0 commit comments