Create qml.tex

Author: mhjensen

doc/Admin/Applications/qml.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+\documentclass[11pt]{article}
+\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
+\usepackage{times}
+\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts}
+\usepackage{setspace}
+\usepackage{cite}
+\usepackage{hyperref}
+\setstretch{1.2}
+
+\title{\textbf{Quantum Machine Learning: A Research Agenda at the Intersection of Quantum Computing and Artificial Intelligence}}
+\author{}
+\date{}
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\maketitle
+
+\section*{1. Introduction and Motivation}
+
+Quantum Machine Learning (QML) is an emerging research area at the frontier of quantum computing and artificial intelligence. The premise of QML is to enhance the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms by exploiting the unique capabilities of quantum computers, such as superposition, entanglement, and quantum interference \cite{biamonte2017}. As quantum hardware matures, QML may become a key driver of progress in both foundational computational science and application domains ranging from healthcare and finance to physics and chemistry.
+
+Recent breakthroughs in quantum information theory and the advent of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices have made it possible to begin exploring small-scale quantum algorithms for real-world learning tasks. Variational quantum circuits, quantum kernel methods, and quantum-inspired neural networks offer promising approaches to integrating quantum and classical paradigms \cite{schuld2015, cerezo2021}. However, QML also poses fundamental open questions about quantum generalization, noise resilience, and computational advantage.
+
+This research proposal aims to develop new QML algorithms, characterize their theoretical performance, and implement them in hybrid quantum-classical settings. We also seek to identify practical use cases where QML can make an impact in the near term and prepare the groundwork for longer-term breakthroughs in quantum-enhanced learning.
+
+\section*{2. Research Objectives}
+
+The proposed research has four primary objectives:
+
+\begin{enumerate}
+  \item \textbf{Develop New Quantum Machine Learning Algorithms:} Explore both supervised and unsupervised learning models implemented on quantum architectures, with a focus on variational quantum circuits, quantum support vector machines (QSVMs), and quantum kernel methods \cite{havlicek2019, rebentrost2014}.
+  
+  \item \textbf{Theoretical Characterization of Learning Performance:} Analyze the expressiveness, trainability, and generalization properties of quantum models. Study conditions under which quantum algorithms can outperform classical methods in terms of sample complexity or computational efficiency \cite{schuld2021}.
+  
+  \item \textbf{Hybrid Quantum-Classical Implementations:} Design scalable algorithms deployable on NISQ devices, using hybrid feedback loops for optimization (e.g., quantum neural networks trained via classical gradient descent or parameter-shift rules).
+  
+  \item \textbf{Application to Real-World Data:} Apply developed methods to selected datasets in domains such as quantum chemistry, medical diagnosis, and financial forecasting to demonstrate feasibility and assess quantum advantage.
+\end{enumerate}
+
+\section*{3. Background and State of the Art}
+
+Machine learning has become the dominant paradigm for data-driven modeling. Classical neural networks, kernel methods, and ensemble learning have revolutionized fields like computer vision and natural language processing. However, these methods often scale poorly with data dimensionality or require expensive computation.
+
+Quantum computing, grounded in the principles of quantum mechanics, promises to offer fundamentally different ways of processing information. The Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm for solving linear systems \cite{harrow2009} and the quantum phase estimation algorithm are examples of quantum speedups for subroutines relevant to ML. Similarly, quantum-enhanced kernels can embed classical data into high-dimensional Hilbert spaces, enabling more expressive decision boundaries for classification tasks \cite{schuld2019}.
+
+However, quantum advantage in ML remains a theoretical promise unless practically demonstrated. NISQ devices are noisy, of limited qubit count, and require careful optimization strategies to be useful. Therefore, hybrid models—where a quantum circuit acts as a subroutine in a larger classical workflow—are of central importance in QML today.
+
+\section*{4. Methodology and Work Plan}
+
+Our research strategy consists of three pillars: theoretical modeling, algorithm design, and experimental validation.
+
+\subsection*{4.1 Theoretical Modeling and Algorithm Design}
+
+We begin by formalizing learning tasks in a quantum computational framework. For instance, we define quantum circuits that represent function approximators (e.g., quantum perceptrons) and study their learning capabilities under different input encodings (amplitude encoding, basis encoding, etc.).
+
+We will investigate:
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item Expressive power of quantum models vs. classical models
+    \item Circuit depth vs. model complexity trade-offs
+    \item Gradient landscape and barren plateau issues \cite{mcclean2018}
+\end{itemize}
+
+For supervised learning, we will explore quantum classifiers such as:
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVMs)
+    \item Variational Quantum Classifiers (VQCs)
+    \item Quantum Kernel Ridge Regression
+\end{itemize}
+
+For unsupervised learning, we will examine quantum clustering, quantum principal component analysis, and quantum Boltzmann machines.
+
+\subsection*{4.2 Hybrid Quantum-Classical Training}
+
+Given the limitations of current quantum hardware, we adopt a hybrid learning paradigm. Quantum circuits are used as state preparation and transformation devices; measurements are used to extract observables related to loss functions. Classical optimizers update the parameters iteratively.
+
+We will:
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item Implement training algorithms using parameter-shift rules
+    \item Use simulators (Qiskit, PennyLane) and real backends (e.g., IBM Quantum, Xanadu)
+    \item Develop error mitigation strategies for variational circuits
+\end{itemize}
+
+\subsection*{4.3 Applications and Benchmarking}
+
+We will apply our models to benchmark datasets such as:
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item MNIST digit classification (reduced dimensionality)
+    \item Quantum chemistry datasets (e.g., molecular energy regression)
+    \item Financial time series (binary classification of risk or anomaly detection)
+\end{itemize}
+
+For each, we will compare quantum models against classical baselines in terms of accuracy, training time, and resource usage.
+
+\section*{5. Expected Impact and Outcomes}
+
+This research has the potential to make significant contributions at multiple levels:
+
+\subsection*{5.1 Scientific Impact}
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item Advance the theoretical understanding of quantum learning models
+    \item Provide a rigorous comparison of classical and quantum learning algorithms
+    \item Contribute open-source implementations and benchmarks
+\end{itemize}
+
+\subsection*{5.2 Technological Impact}
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item Push the boundary of what can be computed on NISQ devices
+    \item Develop hybrid algorithms applicable in real industrial settings
+    \item Contribute to quantum software tooling (parameter tuning, error mitigation)
+\end{itemize}
+
+\subsection*{5.3 Societal Impact}
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item Apply QML to domains with high societal value (e.g., medical diagnostics)
+    \item Contribute to the training of researchers in quantum AI
+    \item Support national efforts in building quantum readiness
+\end{itemize}
+
+\section*{6. Timeline and Deliverables (3-year Plan)}
+
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item \textbf{Year 1:} Theoretical development, simulation of toy models, publication of initial algorithms.
+    \item \textbf{Year 2:} Implementation on quantum hardware, hybrid optimization strategies, noise-aware benchmarking.
+    \item \textbf{Year 3:} Application to real datasets, comparative analysis, final software release and publication.
+\end{itemize}
+
+\section*{7. References}
+
+\begin{thebibliography}{99}
+\bibitem{biamonte2017} J. Biamonte \textit{et al.}, ``Quantum machine learning,'' \textit{Nature}, vol. 549, pp. 195–202, 2017.
+
+\bibitem{schuld2015} M. Schuld, I. Sinayskiy, and F. Petruccione, ``An introduction to quantum machine learning,'' \textit{Contemporary Physics}, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 172–185, 2015.
+
+\bibitem{cerezo2021} M. Cerezo \textit{et al.}, ``Variational quantum algorithms,'' \textit{Nature Reviews Physics}, vol. 3, pp. 625–644, 2021.
+
+\bibitem{harrow2009} A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, ``Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations,'' \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.}, vol. 103, no. 15, p. 150502, 2009.
+
+\bibitem{havlicek2019} V. Havlíček \textit{et al.}, ``Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces,'' \textit{Nature}, vol. 567, pp. 209–212, 2019.
+
+\bibitem{rebentrost2014} P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, and S. Lloyd, ``Quantum support vector machine for big data classification,'' \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.}, vol. 113, p. 130503, 2014.
+
+\bibitem{schuld2019} M. Schuld and N. Killoran, ``Quantum machine learning in feature Hilbert spaces,'' \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.}, vol. 122, no. 4, p. 040504, 2019.
+
+\bibitem{schuld2021} M. Schuld, ``Machine learning models that remember too much,'' \textit{Nature Machine Intelligence}, vol. 3, pp. 103–104, 2021.
+
+\bibitem{mcclean2018} J. R. McClean \textit{et al.}, ``Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes,'' \textit{Nature Communications}, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2018.
+\end{thebibliography}
+
+\end{document}