You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@@ -84,15 +72,13 @@ Please analyze the trace of the implementation attempt and provide:
84
72
2. Key strengths and weaknesses of the implementation
85
73
3. Numerical scores (0-10):
86
74
- Completion: How completely and correctly was the spec implemented compared to the ground truth changes?
87
-
- Efficiency: How efficiently did Codebuff respond to the Agent's prompts without taking unnecessary steps? Speed is important! Consider the task duration of ${durationSeconds} seconds.
88
75
- Code Quality: How well-structured, maintainable and idiomatic is the code?
89
76
- Overall: Combined assessment of the implementation quality
90
77
91
78
Focus on:
92
79
- Correctness and completeness compared to the ground truth changes
93
80
- Quality of the code produced
94
81
- Minimal changes: it's better to change as little code as possible to accomplish what the agent prompted
95
-
- Speed and efficiency: did Codebuff make unnecessary changes or take unnecessary steps? The task took ${durationSeconds} seconds - was this reasonable for the complexity?
96
82
- Error: If there was an error encountered, you should give a very low score.
97
83
98
84
Provide your response in a structured format with analysis, lists of strengths and weaknesses, and metrics.`
0 commit comments