Update index.html

Schema Fix

Author: Gmac4247

index.html

@@ -5436,17 +5436,16 @@ <h3 itemprop="name" style="margin:7px">Calculate the Volume of a Tetrahedron</h3
 </div>
 </section>
 <br><br><br>
-<div style="margin:12px" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Statement">
-<p itemprop="description"><strong>This is the one and only exact, self-contained geometric framework grounded in the first principles of mathematics.</strong></p>
+<p style="margin:12px" itemprop="description"><strong>This is the one and only exact, self-contained geometric framework grounded in the first principles of mathematics.</strong></p>
 <br>
-<p itemprop="description"><strong>Exact formulas for real-world applications like analysis, engineering design solutions, computer graphics rendering, algorithm optimization, and navigation.</strong></p>
+<p style="margin:12px" itemprop="description"><strong>Exact formulas for real-world applications like analysis, engineering design solutions, computer graphics rendering, algorithm optimization, and navigation.</strong></p>
 <br>
-<p itemprop="description"><strong>
+<p style="margin:12px" itemprop="description"><strong>
 Geometry, in its original spirit, was functional.
 <br>
 It dealt with shapes, areas, volumes, and constructions — not abstractions, limits, or analytic assumptions.</strong></p>
 <br>
-<div itemprop="disambiguatingDescription"><p><strong>
+<div style="margin:12px" itemprop="disambiguatingDescription"><p><strong>
 What is commonly presented today as standard, applied geometry is often referred to as “Euclidean geometry.” In practice, however, it is a blend of two very different traditions:</strong></p>
 <br>
 <ul>
@@ -5464,10 +5463,10 @@ <h3 itemprop="name" style="margin:7px">Calculate the Volume of a Tetrahedron</h3
 <p><strong>These additions were not part of Euclid’s original system. Over time, they quietly shifted geometry from a constructive science grounded in physical reasoning into a more abstract, analytic discipline.</strong></p>
 </div>
 <br>
-<p itemprop="disambiguatingDescription"><strong>
+<p style="margin:12px" itemprop="disambiguatingDescription"><strong>
 By fundamentally shifting the axioms from the abstract, zero-dimensional point to the square and the cube as the primary, physically-relevant units for measurement, this system defines the properties of shapes like the circle and sphere not through abstract limits, but through their direct, rational relationship to these foundational units. The results of these formulas align better with physical reality than the traditional abstract approximations.</strong></p>
 <br><br>
-<p itemprop="usageInfo">
+<p style="margin:12px" itemprop="usageInfo">
 Comparative Geometry
 <br>
 Using geometric relationships to derive areas and volumes.
@@ -5480,12 +5479,11 @@ <h3 itemprop="name" style="margin:7px">Calculate the Volume of a Tetrahedron</h3
 <br>
 Simplifying equations to ensure consistency and precision.</p>
 <br><br><br><br>
-  <div itemprop="copyrightHolder" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person">
+  <div style="margin:12px" itemprop="copyrightHolder" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person">
     <p><span itemprop="name">Gaál Sándor</span></p>
   </div>
-	<p itemprop="copyrightNotice">® All rights reserved</p>
-	<p itemprop="copyrightYear">2026</p>
-</div>
+	<p style="margin:12px" itemprop="copyrightNotice">® All rights reserved</p>
+	<p style="margin:12px" itemprop="copyrightYear">2026</p>
 </main>
 <br>
 <footer>