You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
<h2itemprop="disambiguatingDescription">I remembered the number 3.14 called the pi, but I was interested in the logic of comparing the circle to a square, because the square is the basis of area calculation. That is why we use square units.</h2>
104
103
<br>
@@ -130,7 +129,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="disambiguatingDescription">I remembered the number 3.14 called the
130
129
For about a year I just kept thinking and calculating all aspects of that, and I shared my discovery just with a few friends. They didn't share my excitement.
131
130
<br>
132
131
Some of them didn't really care about math at all, those who did were sticking to the pi, just because it's an old and highly hyped convention.</p>
133
-
<br><br>
132
+
<br><br><br>
134
133
<h2itemprop="description">Meanwhile I figured that by extending the area of a circle to 3D, the volume of a sphere equals the cubed value of the square root of its cross-sectional area, just like a cube.</h2>
135
134
<br>
136
135
<pitemprop="text">It's quite hard to physically accurately measure the volume of a ball, but there's a significant difference between the result of my V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula and the conventional " 4 / 3 × pi × r³ ".
@@ -152,11 +151,11 @@ <h2 itemprop="description">Meanwhile I figured that by extending the area of a c
152
151
</div>
153
152
<br>
154
153
<pitemprop="text">The second sphere experiment was done with the same ball and a nominal 5 ml syringe. The nominal volume of a syringe should be its real volume. However, I have measured its length and width to make sure and I found that its real volume is about 10% larger. I took that into account in the calculations.</p>
155
-
<br><br>
154
+
<br><br><br>
156
155
<h2itemprop="description">I have derived the volume of a cone by comparing a vertical quadrant of a cone to an octant of a sphere.</h2>
157
156
<br>
158
157
<pitemprop="text">First I made a mistake in that. I knew that the height has to be divided by 2, not 3 as they usually do it, but I confused the vertical height with the slant height and I divided it by 2 only once, instead of twice. That resulted in an error.</p>
159
-
<br><br>
158
+
<br><br><br>
160
159
<h2itemprop="description">In early 2020 there were news about that online education was introduced because of the pandemic.</h2>
161
160
<br>
162
161
<pitemprop="text">I thought it was time to share my discoveries online, so I went to the local public library to publish them on a webpage. My volume formula for a cone and a pyramid was undeveloped and I didn't have much web development skills but I had to start somewhere. My attention was divided by lots of details in both geometry and IT.
@@ -192,8 +191,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="description">In early 2020 there were news about that online educa
192
191
</div>
193
192
<br>
194
193
<pitemprop="description">Exactly determining the properties of different shapes is in the scope.</p>
195
-
<br>
196
-
<br>
194
+
<br><br><br>
197
195
<h2itemprop="description">I named my framework the Core Geometric System ™ and put the trademark symbol on it to indicate that this not just another abstract geometric system.</h2>
198
196
<br>
199
197
<pitemprop="text">The name reflects that my logic is built in accordance with the core principles of elementary mathematics. That is something that people assume of the conventional one and they have no idea how badly it deviated from that.
@@ -203,7 +201,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="description">I named my framework the Core Geometric System ™ an
203
201
Interestingly, now language models explain it like some generic term without even referencing my work.
204
202
<br>
205
203
The trademark symbol indicates that it's not to be confused with some generic term. While it might be surprising in the 21st century, this is the first and only geometric system in accordance with the core principles of elementary mathematics.</p>
206
-
<br><br>
204
+
<br><br><br>
207
205
<h2itemprop="description">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for my cone and pyramid volume formula. </h2>
208
206
<br>
209
207
<pitemprop="text">I'm sorry about that I had presented a wrong number for such a long time, but at least my logic was closer to reality.
@@ -219,7 +217,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="description">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for my cone and pyr
219
217
It was very disturbing. But I was able to spot their recurring arguments. And I questioned them until they revealed all the inconsistent details they were trying to hide.
220
218
<br>
221
219
Those are the logical flaws in conventional geometry.</p>
222
-
<br><br>
220
+
<br><br><br>
223
221
<h2itemprop="usageInfo">While trying to explain it to others, I have found that different people have different levels of education.</h2>
224
222
<br>
225
223
<pitemprop="text">I thought I can't just start the explanation with the numbers and basic operations.
0 commit comments