Update dateModified and improve wording in about.html

Author: Gmac4247

about.html

@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
 },
 "dateCreated": "2024-08-31",
 "datePublished": "2024-08-31",
-"dateModified": "2025-11-08",
+"dateModified": "2025-11-09",
 "description": "About the context of the Core Geometric System ™, the best-established and most accurate framework to calculate area and volume.",
 "disambiguatingDescription": "Exact, empirically grounded and rigorously proven formulas over the conventional approximations.",
 "headline": "Introducing the Core Geometric System ™",
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ <h1 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px;">How Accurate Are The Conventional Geometr
 Hence the value of the π lies between two underestimates. What we’re left with is not a proof, but a layered approximation.
 <br>
 <br>
-Similarly, the area formula A = πr² is not a direct result of calculus. It’s reverse-engineered by multiplying the circumference formula C = 2πr by half the radius—treating the area as the sum of infinitesimal rings. While the result is numerically valid, it bypasses the geometric logic that defines area: the comparison to a square.
+Similarly, the area formula A = πr² is not a direct result of calculus. It’s reverse-engineered by multiplying the circumference formula C = 2πr by half the radius—treating the area as the sum of infinitesimal rings. While the method is algebraically valid, it bypasses the geometric logic that defines area: the comparison to a square.
 </p>
 <br>
 <br>
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ <h1 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px;">How Accurate Are The Conventional Geometr
 <p style="margin:12px;">Which is equivalent to 1 = 1 .
 <br>
 <br>
-The quadrant method proves that the area of a circle equals exactly 3.2 × radius², ruling out the validity of the π.
+The quadrant method proves that the area of a circle equals exactly 3.2 × radius², thus ruling out the validity of the π.
 </p>
 </section>
 <br>
@@ -872,13 +872,7 @@ <h1 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px;">How Accurate Are The Conventional Geometr
     <img class="center-fit" src="circumference.jpg" alt="figure-circumference=6.4r" id="circumference">
     </div>
 <br>
-<p style="margin:12px;">For the derivation method to be valid it has to have a thickness. 
-<br>
-<br>
-Its value has to be greater than 0, by at least the smallest number. 
-<br>
-<br>
-For that reason the circumference just approaches 6.4 × radius. 
+<p style="margin:12px;">For the derivation method to be valid it has to have a thickness greater than 0, by at least the smallest number. For that reason the circumference just approaches 6.4 × radius. 
 </p>
 <br>
 <br>
@@ -1259,7 +1253,6 @@ <h2 style="margin:6px;">SURFACE AREA OF A SPHERE</h2>
   </div>
 </div>
 <br>
-<br>
 <section>
 <p style="margin:12px;">The commonly used base × height / 3 approximation for the volume of a pyramid was likely estimated based on two observations. 
 <br>