Skip to content

Commit 5f766bc

Browse files
authored
Update about.html
1 parent 1024814 commit 5f766bc

1 file changed

Lines changed: 15 additions & 45 deletions

File tree

about.html

Lines changed: 15 additions & 45 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -364,53 +364,20 @@ <h2 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px;">Disapproval of the mathematical constant
364364
<br>
365365
<br>
366366
By focusing on area relationships and direct comparisons between shapes, the above method emphasizes a more intuitive and potentially more fundamental understanding of geometric concepts.
367+
</p>
367368
<br>
368369
<br>
369370
<div>
370371
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://youtube.com/embed/-gvXLaLFXuM">
371372
</iframe>
372373
</div>
373374
<br>
375+
<p style="margin:12px;">
374376
The quadrant method not only proves that the area of a circle is 3.2 × ( square value of the radius ), it necessarily rules out the validity of the π.
375377
<br>
376378
<br>
377379
Using the same quadrants model, in which we were able to find a direct relationship between the radius of the circle and the side length of the square that equals in area by ensuring that the overlaps equal the unfilled space,
378-
and the radius of the circle equals
379-
</p>
380-
<math style="margin:12px;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" >
381-
<mrow>
382-
<msqrt>
383-
<mrow>
384-
<msup>
385-
<mrow>
386-
<mo>(</mo>
387-
<mfrac>
388-
<mi>side</mi>
389-
<mn>4</mn>
390-
</mfrac>
391-
<mo>)</mo>
392-
</mrow>
393-
<mn>2</mn>
394-
</msup>
395-
<mo>+</mo>
396-
<msup>
397-
<mrow>
398-
<mo>(</mo>
399-
<mfrac>
400-
<mi>side</mi>
401-
<mn>2</mn>
402-
</mfrac>
403-
<mo>)</mo>
404-
</mrow>
405-
<mn>2</mn>
406-
</msup>
407-
</mrow>
408-
</msqrt>
409-
<mo>=</mo>
410-
</mrow>
411-
</math>
412-
<p style="margin:12px;">
413-
√5 × quarter side, I change the side length of the square to √π, assuming that the area of a circle equals π × ( square value of the radius ).
380+
and the radius of the circle equals √5 × quarter of the side, I change the side length of the square to √π, assuming that the area of a circle equals π × ( square value of the radius ).
414381
<br>
415382
<br>
416383
The idea is that the area of the circle equals to the area of the square. Looking for the ratio between the length of the side, I could denote the side of the square as 1, and compare the radius to that, or denote the radius as 1 and express the side compared to that.
@@ -540,6 +507,7 @@ <h2 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px;">Disapproval of the mathematical constant
540507
The best practice is writing it as it is.
541508
</p>
542509
<br>
510+
<br>
543511
<div class="imgbox">
544512
<img class="center-fit" src="recycle.png" alt="Recycle">
545513
</div>
@@ -548,18 +516,18 @@ <h2 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px;">Disapproval of the mathematical constant
548516
<br>
549517
<br>
550518
<br>
551-
519+
<h3 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px;">Volume of a pyramid</h3>
552520
<br>
553521
<br>
554522
<br>
555523
<br>
556524
<div>
557-
<p style="margin:12px;">The commonly used base × height / 3 approximation for the volume of a cone was likely estimated based on two observations.
525+
<p style="margin:12px;">The commonly used base × height / 3 approximation for the volume of a pyramid was likely estimated based on two observations.
558526
<br>
559527
<br>
560-
One is that the area of the mid-height cross section of a regular cone - of which's apex can be connected to the midpoint of the base with a perpendicular line - is exactly a quarter of a circumscribed solid's with the same base and height.
528+
One is that the area of the mid-height cross section of a regular pyramid - of which's apex can be connected to the midpoint of the base with a perpendicular line - is exactly a quarter of a circumscribed solid's with the same base and height.
561529
<br>
562-
That makes the ratio between the mid-height cross-sectional area of the cone, and the difference between the mid-height cross-sectional areas of the circumscribed solid and the cone
530+
That makes the ratio between the mid-height cross-sectional area of the pyramid, and the difference between the mid-height cross-sectional areas of the circumscribed solid and the pyramid
563531
</p>
564532
<br>
565533
<br>
@@ -648,7 +616,10 @@ <h2 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px;">Disapproval of the mathematical constant
648616
</math>
649617
<br>
650618
<br>
651-
<p style="margin:12px;">1 : 3 .
619+
<p style="margin:12px;">1 : 3
620+
<br>
621+
<br>
622+
.
652623
</p>
653624
<br>
654625
<br>
@@ -666,16 +637,15 @@ <h2 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px;">Disapproval of the mathematical constant
666637
<br>
667638
<br>
668639
<p style="margin:12px;">The other idea is the cube dissection.
669-
<br>
670-
A common method aiming to prove the pyramid volume formula ( V = 1/3 × base × height ) involves dissecting a cube into three pyramids. Here’s how it’s typically presented:
671640
</p>
672641
<br>
642+
<br>
673643
<div class="imgbox">
674644
<img class="center-fit" src="cubeDissection.jpeg" alt="Cube-dissection" id="dissection">
675645
</div>
676646
<br>
677-
<br>
678-
<p style="margin:12px;">Standard Cube Dissection Method:
647+
<p style="margin:12px;">A common method aiming to prove the pyramid volume formula ( V = base × height / 3 ) involves dissecting a cube into three pyramids. Here’s how it’s typically presented:
648+
</p>
679649
<br>
680650
<br>
681651
Take a cube with an edge length of ( e ).

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)