Skip to content

Commit 3b56b6a

Browse files
authored
Update about.html
1 parent caf7f98 commit 3b56b6a

File tree

1 file changed

+11
-7
lines changed

1 file changed

+11
-7
lines changed

about.html

Lines changed: 11 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -100,10 +100,10 @@ <h1 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">About the Core Geometric System ™</h1>
100100
<h2 style="margin:12px">Once around 2018 I was wondering how to calculate the area of a circle.</h2>
101101
<br>
102102
<section style="margin:12px" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Article">
103-
<h2 itemprop="disambiguatingDescription" style="margin:12px">I remembered the number 3.14 called the pi, but I was interested in the logic of comparing the circle to a square.</h2>
104-
<p itemprop="text">Because the square is the basis of area calculation. That is why we use square units.
105103
<br>
106-
The only problem with that was that the circle is not square. I have figured that the circle can be cut into four and then I get four right angles that can be aligned with the vertices of a square.
104+
<h2 itemprop="disambiguatingDescription">I remembered the number 3.14 called the pi, but I was interested in the logic of comparing the circle to a square, because the square is the basis of area calculation. That is why we use square units.</h2>
105+
<br>
106+
<p itemprop="text">The only problem with that was that the circle is not square. I have figured that the circle can be cut in four and then I get four right angles that can be aligned with the vertices of a square.
107107
<br>
108108
There was a different problem with that: The quadrant circles overlap at some places but the middle of the square is uncovered.
109109
<br>
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="disambiguatingDescription" style="margin:12px">I remembered the nu
133133
Some of them didn't really care about math at all, those who did were sticking to the pi, just because it's an old and highly hyped convention.</p>
134134
<br><br>
135135
<h2 itemprop="description">Meanwhile I figured that by extending the area of a circle to 3D, the volume of a sphere equals the cubed value of the square root of its cross-sectional area, just like a cube.</h2>
136+
<br>
136137
<p itemprop="text">It's quite hard to physically accurately measure the volume of a ball, but there's a significant difference between the result of my V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula and the conventional " 4 / 3 × pi × r³ ".
137138
<br><br>
138139
I conducted some experiments with the resources that I had. I could not provide the accuracy that the subject deserves, but the results aligned better with my V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula.</p>
@@ -142,8 +143,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="description">Meanwhile I figured that by extending the area of a c
142143
</iframe>
143144
</div>
144145
<br>
145-
<p itemprop="text">
146-
The subject of the sphere experiment was a standard golf ball. That is not a perfect sphere because there are dimples on its surface. That can be compensated by calculating with a slightly shorter radius.
146+
<p itemprop="text">The subject of the sphere experiment was a standard golf ball. That is not a perfect sphere because there are dimples on its surface. That can be compensated by calculating with a slightly shorter radius.
147147
<br>
148148
The measuring bottle had a nominal volume of 4 cl (40 ml ~ 4 / 3 US ounce). That is not perfectly precise either because the nominal volume indicates the guaranteed amount of the fluid in it in commerce. They come with an air gap atop the fluid so the total capacity of the bottle is somewhat larger.</p>
149149
<br><br>
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="description">Meanwhile I figured that by extending the area of a c
154154
<p itemprop="text">The second sphere experiment was done with the same ball and a nominal 5 ml syringe. The nominal volume of a syringe should be its real volume. However, I have measured its length and width to make sure and I found that its real volume is about 10% larger. I took that into account in the calculations.</p>
155155
<br><br>
156156
<h2 itemprop="description">I have derived the volume of a cone by comparing a vertical quadrant of a cone to an octant of a sphere.</h2>
157+
<br>
157158
<p itemprop="text">First I made a mistake in that. I knew that the height has to be divided by 2, not 3 as they usually do it, but I confused the vertical height with the slant height and I divided it by 2 only once, instead of twice. That resulted in an error.</p>
158159
<br><br>
159160
<h2 itemprop="description">In early 2020 there were news about that online education was introduced because of the pandemic.</h2>
@@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="description">In early 2020 there were news about that online educa
194195
<br>
195196
<br>
196197
<h2 itemprop="description">I named my framework the Core Geometric System ™ and put the trademark symbol on it to indicate that this not just another abstract geometric system.</h2>
198+
<br>
197199
<p itemprop="text">The name reflects that my logic is built in accordance with the core principles of elementary mathematics. That is something that people assume of the conventional one and they have no idea how badly it deviated from that.
198200
<br><br>
199201
The expression was unique back then. I came up with it. I never read it anywhere else before. Back then I searched for it to find out if anyone else is using it, and there were no results for that term.
@@ -202,7 +204,8 @@ <h2 itemprop="description">I named my framework the Core Geometric System ™ an
202204
<br>
203205
The trademark symbol indicates that it's not to be confused with some generic term. While it might be surprising in the 21st century, this is the first and only geometric system in accordance with the core principles of elementary mathematics.</p>
204206
<br><br>
205-
<h2 itemprop="description" style="margin:12px">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for my cone and pyramid volume formula. </h2>
207+
<h2 itemprop="description">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for my cone and pyramid volume formula. </h2>
208+
<br>
206209
<p itemprop="text">I'm sorry about that I had presented a wrong number for such a long time, but at least my logic was closer to reality.
207210
<br><br>
208211
Later that year I got access to AI language models.
@@ -217,7 +220,8 @@ <h2 itemprop="description" style="margin:12px">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value
217220
<br>
218221
Those are the logical flaws in conventional geometry.</p>
219222
<br><br>
220-
<h2 itemprop="usageInfo" style="margin:12px">While trying to explain it to others, I have found that different people have different levels of education.</h2>
223+
<h2 itemprop="usageInfo">While trying to explain it to others, I have found that different people have different levels of education.</h2>
224+
<br>
221225
<p itemprop="text">I thought I can't just start the explanation with the numbers and basic operations.
222226
<br>
223227
Then I realized that I can.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)