You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
<h2itemprop="disambiguatingDescription" style="margin:12px">I remembered the number 3.14 called the pi, but I was interested in the logic of comparing the circle to a square.</h2>
104
-
<pitemprop="text">Because the square is the basis of area calculation. That is why we use square units.
105
103
<br>
106
-
The only problem with that was that the circle is not square. I have figured that the circle can be cut into four and then I get four right angles that can be aligned with the vertices of a square.
104
+
<h2itemprop="disambiguatingDescription">I remembered the number 3.14 called the pi, but I was interested in the logic of comparing the circle to a square, because the square is the basis of area calculation. That is why we use square units.</h2>
105
+
<br>
106
+
<pitemprop="text">The only problem with that was that the circle is not square. I have figured that the circle can be cut in four and then I get four right angles that can be aligned with the vertices of a square.
107
107
<br>
108
108
There was a different problem with that: The quadrant circles overlap at some places but the middle of the square is uncovered.
109
109
<br>
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="disambiguatingDescription" style="margin:12px">I remembered the nu
133
133
Some of them didn't really care about math at all, those who did were sticking to the pi, just because it's an old and highly hyped convention.</p>
134
134
<br><br>
135
135
<h2itemprop="description">Meanwhile I figured that by extending the area of a circle to 3D, the volume of a sphere equals the cubed value of the square root of its cross-sectional area, just like a cube.</h2>
136
+
<br>
136
137
<pitemprop="text">It's quite hard to physically accurately measure the volume of a ball, but there's a significant difference between the result of my V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula and the conventional " 4 / 3 × pi × r³ ".
137
138
<br><br>
138
139
I conducted some experiments with the resources that I had. I could not provide the accuracy that the subject deserves, but the results aligned better with my V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula.</p>
@@ -142,8 +143,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="description">Meanwhile I figured that by extending the area of a c
142
143
</iframe>
143
144
</div>
144
145
<br>
145
-
<pitemprop="text">
146
-
The subject of the sphere experiment was a standard golf ball. That is not a perfect sphere because there are dimples on its surface. That can be compensated by calculating with a slightly shorter radius.
146
+
<pitemprop="text">The subject of the sphere experiment was a standard golf ball. That is not a perfect sphere because there are dimples on its surface. That can be compensated by calculating with a slightly shorter radius.
147
147
<br>
148
148
The measuring bottle had a nominal volume of 4 cl (40 ml ~ 4 / 3 US ounce). That is not perfectly precise either because the nominal volume indicates the guaranteed amount of the fluid in it in commerce. They come with an air gap atop the fluid so the total capacity of the bottle is somewhat larger.</p>
149
149
<br><br>
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="description">Meanwhile I figured that by extending the area of a c
154
154
<pitemprop="text">The second sphere experiment was done with the same ball and a nominal 5 ml syringe. The nominal volume of a syringe should be its real volume. However, I have measured its length and width to make sure and I found that its real volume is about 10% larger. I took that into account in the calculations.</p>
155
155
<br><br>
156
156
<h2itemprop="description">I have derived the volume of a cone by comparing a vertical quadrant of a cone to an octant of a sphere.</h2>
157
+
<br>
157
158
<pitemprop="text">First I made a mistake in that. I knew that the height has to be divided by 2, not 3 as they usually do it, but I confused the vertical height with the slant height and I divided it by 2 only once, instead of twice. That resulted in an error.</p>
158
159
<br><br>
159
160
<h2itemprop="description">In early 2020 there were news about that online education was introduced because of the pandemic.</h2>
@@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="description">In early 2020 there were news about that online educa
194
195
<br>
195
196
<br>
196
197
<h2itemprop="description">I named my framework the Core Geometric System ™ and put the trademark symbol on it to indicate that this not just another abstract geometric system.</h2>
198
+
<br>
197
199
<pitemprop="text">The name reflects that my logic is built in accordance with the core principles of elementary mathematics. That is something that people assume of the conventional one and they have no idea how badly it deviated from that.
198
200
<br><br>
199
201
The expression was unique back then. I came up with it. I never read it anywhere else before. Back then I searched for it to find out if anyone else is using it, and there were no results for that term.
@@ -202,7 +204,8 @@ <h2 itemprop="description">I named my framework the Core Geometric System ™ an
202
204
<br>
203
205
The trademark symbol indicates that it's not to be confused with some generic term. While it might be surprising in the 21st century, this is the first and only geometric system in accordance with the core principles of elementary mathematics.</p>
204
206
<br><br>
205
-
<h2itemprop="description" style="margin:12px">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for my cone and pyramid volume formula. </h2>
207
+
<h2itemprop="description">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for my cone and pyramid volume formula. </h2>
208
+
<br>
206
209
<pitemprop="text">I'm sorry about that I had presented a wrong number for such a long time, but at least my logic was closer to reality.
207
210
<br><br>
208
211
Later that year I got access to AI language models.
@@ -217,7 +220,8 @@ <h2 itemprop="description" style="margin:12px">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value
217
220
<br>
218
221
Those are the logical flaws in conventional geometry.</p>
219
222
<br><br>
220
-
<h2itemprop="usageInfo" style="margin:12px">While trying to explain it to others, I have found that different people have different levels of education.</h2>
223
+
<h2itemprop="usageInfo">While trying to explain it to others, I have found that different people have different levels of education.</h2>
224
+
<br>
221
225
<pitemprop="text">I thought I can't just start the explanation with the numbers and basic operations.
0 commit comments