Update about.html

Update on the historical context and added usage info.

Author: Gmac4247

about.html

@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
 },
 "dateCreated" :"2024-08-31",
 "datePublished":"2024-08-31",
-"dateModified" :"2025-05-05",
+"dateModified" :"2025-05-19",
 "description" : "Is there a more accurate way to calculate area and volume in the real world? The Core Geometric System offers a compelling alternative to conventional geometry, exploring fundamental relationships and providing precise formulas based on empirical considerations. Discover a new approach to circles, spheres, and other shapes, and explore its potential in diverse fields from engineering to quantum computing.",
 "disambiguatingDescription": "The conventional formulas (A = π × r² for the area of a circle and V = 4 /3 × π × r³ for the volume of a sphere) are inaccurate for real-world measurements. The constant (3.2) and the A = 3.2r² and V = ( √( 3.2 )r )³ formulas are far more accurate, and align better with Euclidean geometry, verified by physical measurements. Archimedes’ methods, while historically significant, introduce an error by converging to incorrect estimations, making his formulas deviations from the true geometry of physical objects.",	
 	"image":[
@@ -344,11 +344,11 @@ <h1 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px;">How Accurate Are The Conventional Geometr
 This method has several limitations. He tried to increase the accuracy by increasing the number of sides of the polygons. This approach cannot produce an accurate result. 
 <br>
 <br>
-The same coefficient was used to calculate the ratio between the squared radius and the area of a circle.
+The same coefficient was used to calculate the ratio between the area and the squared radius of a circle.
 Despite these early advances, a precise, universally accepted value of this constant remained elusive for centuries. 
 <br>
 <br>
-With its value believed to be an infinite fraction, it seemed necessary to denote it by a sign in the equations.
+Being uncertain about its numeric value and how to calculate it, it was comfortable to denote it by a sign in the equations.
 It was not until the 18th century that the symbol π, popularized by the mathematicians of the time, gained widespread acceptance.
 <br>
 <br>
@@ -1376,7 +1376,17 @@ <h5 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px;">Disapproval of the mathematical constant
 <br>
 <br>
 The π is a very rough approximation; 3.2 is an exact value.
-</p>
+<br>
+<br>
+The ratio between the area and the radius of a circle is calculable. 
+<br>
+The ratio between the circumference and the diameter can be calculated from that. 
+<br>
+The coefficient is a real number. 
+<br>
+There's no reason to substitute it with a sign. 
+<br>
+The best practice is writing it as it is.</p>
 </div>
 <br>
 <br>