It may be worth migrating the naming of IntegrationRegistration into BandRegistration? The IntegrationRegistration assumes that you are either using only integration ROIs of the same height and dilation or spaced out raster of the same dilation. The same dilation is required because you are comparing to a CONFIG2 reference stack (whose dilation matches that of the band). Though this pattern of ROIs can be formed using underlying SLAP2 raster or integration ROIs, this constant dilation/height of ROIs is more consistent with "band scanning" now compared to "integration scanning," where shapes of ROIs are allowed to be arbitrary.
It may be worth migrating the naming of IntegrationRegistration into BandRegistration? The IntegrationRegistration assumes that you are either using only integration ROIs of the same height and dilation or spaced out raster of the same dilation. The same dilation is required because you are comparing to a CONFIG2 reference stack (whose dilation matches that of the band). Though this pattern of ROIs can be formed using underlying SLAP2 raster or integration ROIs, this constant dilation/height of ROIs is more consistent with "band scanning" now compared to "integration scanning," where shapes of ROIs are allowed to be arbitrary.